View Single Post
Old 07-11-2022, 06:12 AM   #26 (permalink)
Ecky
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,096

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,907
Thanked 2,571 Times in 1,594 Posts
Tonight I did a bit of tire research. The car has brand new Michelin Pilot Sport 4's on it, with a very slight oversize (205mm vs 195mm, +1.7% diameter). I have not yet tried to figure out of the odometer reads high or low. This tire size actually sits right in the middle of the two MX-5 trims - some models have 17" wheels with tires another 0.8% larger.

Anyhow, I discovered a site that did comparisons of a lot of the tires I have interest in:

https://alltyretests.com/michelin-en...s-test-review/

https://alltyretests.com/michelin-pilot-sport-4/

In particular:






One thing that surprised me was how well the Vredestein Sportracs fared in their rolling resistance test. These are what I put on the front of my muscle car engine swapped Insight, and I had been surprised to find they didn't hurt fuel economy much compared with the OEM low rolling resistance tires.

Another thing, the hyper aggressive summer tires on the car really aren't that bad.

So, plugging those values into Ecomodder's calculator (and making some educated assumptions), I got the following:




Swapping the coefficient of rolling resistance value to that of Michelin Energy Savers appears to be worth approximately (and optimistically) 2mpg at highway speeds.

Last edited by Ecky; 07-11-2022 at 07:42 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (08-21-2022), pgfpro (07-11-2022)