Thread: Wind turbines
View Single Post
Old 07-22-2022, 04:47 PM   #194 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,757

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,318
Thanked 4,472 Times in 3,437 Posts
Initial thought is I don't like it. There's nothing special about the weight being attached to the generator unless that weight serves double-duty saving cost or reducing complexity. The video didn't mention anything thing about that. As it is, looks like a more complex thing, and no explanation of how the design would reduce the LCOE (Levelized Cost of Energy).

Also, water is way more dense than air, so having the weight underwater is a disadvantage as far as efficiency is concerned. Those weights would be pumping enormous amounts of water as it gets displaced with movement.

I put this in the category of kite wind turbines.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote