View Single Post
Old 10-05-2022, 06:10 PM   #50 (permalink)
Ecky
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,066

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,898
Thanked 2,551 Times in 1,579 Posts
I got around to ordering all of Verus Engineerings' underbody panels plus diffuser.

They also sell canards that attach just in front of the front wheels which actually reduce drag as per their testing, in addition to just increasing downforce. Their explanation is that it reduces turbulence caused by the front wheels, and creates a low pressure zone right around the rear wheel wells, but they honestly look too racey for me. At some point I may fabricate a deflector, but that day is not today.




Once the underbody panels are in place, many of the eccentric bolts used to align the wheels will be inaccessible, so I took the car in for an alignment as well. Here's what I picked out, and what I got:

Before:

Rear camber L: -2.19°
Rear camber R: -1.35°

Rear toe L: -1.5mm (negative means toe out)
Rear toe R: 1.3mm
Total rear toe: -0.2mm (negative means toe out)

Front camber L: -1.12°
Front camber R: -0.34°

Front toe L: 1.7mm
Front toe R: -1.4mm (negative means toe out)
Total front toe: 0.3mm

Front caster L: 8.35°
Front caster R: 8.08°

~

The alignment on the car was pretty neutral, really. Almost zero toe. It was set for a lot of caster, which gives a heavier steering feel and better self-centering, but this was causing the front left wheel to rub the fender liner when turning right, because it was pushed so far forward in the well. The camber was a bit off, but nothing too crazy.

Here's where it landed after the alignment:

Rear camber L: -1.24°
Rear camber R: -1.20°

Rear toe L: 0.6mm
Rear toe R: 0.8mm
Total rear toe: 1.4mm (toe in)

Front camber L: -1.25°
Front camber R: -1.21°

Front toe L: 0.7mm
Front toe R: 0.7mm
Total front toe: 1.4mm (toe in)

Front caster L: 7.27°
Front caster R: 6.59°

~

Overall, the front and rear got a hair of toe-in, but less than what is called for by the factory specs. Toe in tends to make the car very stable, while toe out tends to make it very eager to rotate. Any toe (in or out) causes tire scrub and reduces economy. I can reasonably expect the front to toe out just a hair at highway speeds due to bushing flex. The rear will toe in more under power. The factory spec is ~3.2mm rear toe in, and I had it dialed back to half of that.

Camber is now square around the car. I don't weigh enough to really throw the balance of the car off, and I often have a passenger anyway.

I haven't taken too many high speed corners yet, but the car feels marginally less squirrely.

Caster was dialed back around a degree on both front tires. The steering feel difference is minimal, but as predicted it's both a hair lighter and has a bit less self-centering when you let go of the wheel.

~

In a couple of weeks I'll begin drilling holes in the frame and installing rivet nuts, onto which to attach the underbody panels.

I also ordered an ultra lightweight LiFePO4 motorcycle battery that should have plenty of CCA. It weighs 2.3kg (5lbs) compared with the lead acid currently installed, which weighs 13.6kg (30lbs).
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (10-07-2022)