View Single Post
Old 10-11-2022, 09:56 PM   #4 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
That looks easier to draw than to instantiate.

It would need to be straight as a laser, else at orbital velocity occupants would be shaken up and down and side to side. That might work on the Moon where there is no atmosphere.
Yeah, moon has the advantage of not needing to construct a tube that withstands the crushing force of a vacuum under atmosphere, or the need to create the vacuum in the first place. Getting things off the moon will be a cinch.

I kinda think humans will continue to be sent into orbit on conventional rockets, but other payloads will likely be sent via other means such as Spinlaunch or mass driver. The things we need beyond earth can be delivered relatively cheaply.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote