View Single Post
Old 11-04-2022, 10:59 AM   #22 (permalink)
oil pan 4
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,571 Times in 2,835 Posts
Yeah I saw that. The tests used employed bottle fed hydrogen and appear to use far more hydrogen than an hho machine can make.
The one test showed that adding hydrogen improved fuel economy by a third. How do we know they induce a problem and then fake fix it with hydrogen.
The best way I can think of would be to run the engine at low load, at mid range RPMs, retard timing to reduce fuel economy and then add hydrogen because we know hydrogen burns really fast to make it look like the hydrogen increased fuel economy.
Where if the engine was running properly the hydrogen would have only increased fuel economy by a lab measurable amount.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote