View Single Post
Old 12-19-2022, 03:01 PM   #994 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,228
Thanks: 24,375
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
'inconsequential'

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Concision applied:

'nothing-burger.'
vs
the need for a new experimental and theoretical program

Verbosity applied:

'The authors let[ting?] the air out [of?] their theory, in their own words' call for new and better science whilst you deem it inconsequential.
In your #965 (permalink) you wrote, ' So far he ( Freeman Dyson ) has validated deep, hot biotic oil...'
Which I presume was predicated upon the NATURE Geoscience piece.
Nothing was proven. Nothing validated. Their molecules were gone in a geologic instant.
They openly admit that reality was not represented in the research.
Throwing more time and money at the issue seems like the definition of insanity.
Inorganic carbon is represented in less than one-percent of carbon. Why throw good money after bad?
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 12-19-2022 at 03:03 PM.. Reason: add data
  Reply With Quote