Auto X-Prize sucks!
I was just re-reading the rules for the Automotive X-Prize.
I really think they set the bar WAY TOO HIGH!
For example:
MAINSTREAM CLASS REQUIREMENTS
Capacity: 4 or more passengers (95th percentile adult male) and 10 cubic feet of useful cargo space
Wheels: 4 or more wheels
Performance: 0-60 mph acceleration in less than 12 seconds, minimum top speed 100 mph, minimum range 200 miles, 60 - 0 MPH braking in no more than 170 feet, lateral acceleration (300-ft-dia skidpad) 0.70 g, 600 ft slalom (Motor Trend) speed 55 MPH, gradeability 55 MPH on a 7.5% grade, noise levels within drive-by standards (74 decibels max)
Features: Heater, air-conditioner, audio system, real-time eco-feedback display
Why do we need a MINIMUM top speed of 100 MPH!?!?!?!
Why do we need to go 200 miles on one fueling?
I am not even sure if a Geo Metro would meet the minimum on cargo space!
Granted, this is for the "Mainstream Class", but it sure sounds like trying to have a luxury SUV with the fuel economy of a plug-in hybrid!
Why do we always need MORE, BIGGER, FASTER, MORE EXPENSIVE!!?!?
I applaud everyone on this forum who uses a bike more than a car, an EV more than gasoline, and has every tried to pick up a wrench and fix something themself.
I propose an ANTI-X-PRIZE! The cheapest, simplest vehicle, anyone can use and repair.
Too bad the horse-cart, bicycle, electric golf cart, and many other vehicles already meet these requirements.
They do NOT, however, go over 100 MPH and at least 200 miles on one fueling.
[/RANT]
|