Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
Six posts in 34 minutes. Could you summarize or point to the most relevant one? "[W]ithout a single-spaced, full page of caveats"?
|
* It appears that 'NONE' of what he posts is relevant.
* It's never been, as far as my experience goes.
* There appears to be some presumption that, if he posts an image, that he's in possession of an understanding of what it relates to. And without challenge.
* Every time I look at his posts, I'm reminded about his lack of specialized knowledge.
* Where a team of scientists might take six pages of fine print to flesh out the discussion of a single topic, and provide 75 technical references to accompany their peer-reviewed paper, Mr. Davidson is somehow empowered to cover half a dozen in one, with a single individual's anecdotal testimony?
* I can understand why the scientific community won't dignify any of his ignorant comments with a response.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'self-realization to the impossibility of total knowledge forces deference to entrusted pack members up the hierarchy whom are perceived, deservedly or not, to possess critical survival knowledge which in turn is incorporated into the filter.' ( Hate: Sweeter Than Love,' NATURE, Volume 400, 15 July 1990, p. 217-18 )