Cosmic Catastrophe

[aerohead]

Says who?
How about zero-proficiency!

[aerohead]

Jerry Z. Liu, Ph.D. can't even get 'Abstract' right.
And the eleven-and-a -half lines of text B.D. provides are supposed to be sufficient to make the argument for his 'superconductivity' premise for the magnetosphere?
April fools early?

[freebeard]

Six posts in 34 minutes. Could you summarize or point to the most relevant one? "[W]ithout a single-spaced, full page of caveats"?

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Six posts in 34 minutes. Could you summarize or point to the most relevant one? "[W]ithout a single-spaced, full page of caveats"?

* It appears that 'NONE' of what he posts is relevant.
* It's never been, as far as my experience goes.
* There appears to be some presumption that, if he posts an image, that he's in possession of an understanding of what it relates to. And without challenge.
* Every time I look at his posts, I'm reminded about his lack of specialized knowledge.
* Where a team of scientists might take six pages of fine print to flesh out the discussion of a single topic, and provide 75 technical references to accompany their peer-reviewed paper, Mr. Davidson is somehow empowered to cover half a dozen in one, with a single individual's anecdotal testimony?
* I can understand why the scientific community won't dignify any of his ignorant comments with a response.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'self-realization to the impossibility of total knowledge forces deference to entrusted pack members up the hierarchy whom are perceived, deservedly or not, to possess critical survival knowledge which in turn is incorporated into the filter.' ( Hate: Sweeter Than Love,' NATURE, Volume 400, 15 July 1990, p. 217-18 )

[freebeard]

Six posts .... the most relevant one?

Lost in translation. I intended which of the scattershot posts.

Spaeking of lost in translation --"self-realization to the impossibility of total knowledge forces deference"

What is he on about? I accept Scott Adams argument that peer review is meningless. You might review his seven tells for cognitive dissonance. http://www.scottadamssays.com/the-te...ve-dissonance/

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Her expression the first time the phone rings is droll.

She's like an informed and intelligent Greta.

...anyhow, the Youtube rabbit hole led me to this new rocket company in Washington.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EY8nbSwjtEY

[freebeard]

She's like an informed and intelligent Greta.

I'd go with anti-Greta T. since she's educated and knows whereof she speaks.

[oil pan 4]

What do I think the sun would do if there was an increase in cold dust around the star. Pretty much this:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/spa...-polar-vortex/

The forum needs flood aka aerohead control. I think the part about laws of science being wrong fried a circuit.

Originally Posted by aerohead

You're all aware that solar x-ray emission does nothing to us on Earth?

Yeah that's been proven wrong. But if you feel it's true and insist on believing it be my guest.

Originally Posted by aerohead

And everyone's aware that sunspots have very little to do with total solar irradiance?

Like a broken clock.

Originally Posted by aerohead

I'll go with accepted scientific theory, until it is eclipsed by a newly-proven hypothesis which superannuates it.

There lies the problem. You don't question anything.
Then riddle me this for example why do we continue to say "current follows the path of lease resistance"? It's clearly wrong, it's easy to prove it's wrong and yet no one says anything or tries to correct it. We don't need a new hypnosis, just need to fix what we already have.
If we can't get the basic stuff right how can we expect people to make any kind theory or law that's even close to reality for more complicated phenomena?

This is clearly a post for science plebs and rubes. You are clearly so far ahead on so many levels, every way possible, why waist you time?

[freebeard]

The forum need flood aka aerohead control. I think the part about laws of science being wrong fried a circuit.
[snip]
...why waist you time?

I also am concerned about a fried circuit.

It sounds like you want to put aerohead in control?

I find more value in the kat kartoonist thread. More respect for things like the Overton Window, mass hypnotism, the intrinsic worth of meta studies and peer review and so forth.

[oil pan 4]

Now observes have discovered a dust ring by mercury no one ever noticed before. Yeah sure it's probably always been there.
https://www.newscientist.com/article...dont-know-why/
"Mercury appears to share its orbit with a huge ring of dust millions of kilometres thick, and scientists aren’t sure how it got there. None of the mechanisms researchers could think of to explain it create enough dust, and the region of space it passes through is so close to the sun that we would expect any dust there to be pulled in by the sun’s gravity almost immediately."