View Single Post
Old 04-20-2023, 02:49 AM   #188 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,823

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,481 Times in 3,446 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac Zachary View Post
I'm not sure if I personally agree that OBD II is a necessity. Codes can still be read from previous systems. But yes, a simple OBD II reader would not work making it more of a hassle to get codes.

No OBD II would mean no stick shift Previa as 1996 and 1997 Previas did not have the stick shift option, which would put a damper on my desire to get one, which in turn may be a good thing.
The newest vehicle I own is a 2006 Acura TSX, and it's archaic compared to modern tech. MAP sensor vs MAF. It has a small 2.4L 4-cylinder engine and an efficient aerodynamic shape, yet only manages 30 MPG, which is an improvement in the EPA estimate. It uses hydraulic power steering, belt driven AC, mechanical water pump, etc. All of these systems depend on engine speed, which is not efficient. All of these require an accessory belt, which is not efficient.

An old efficient car was only efficient because it was gutless.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote