Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
If you were actually interested in the subject you would have had ample time to acquaint yourself with the particulars, study the formulas, do the math, and discover for yourself the utter folly of the technique.
I led you to the water. It's up to you whether or not to 'drink'.
Since you're no doubt aware that, I've made transcription errors in the past, a reading of the actual particulars on the part of all interested parties makes it possible to maintain the fidelity of the data. Method in the madness.
|
You're mind reading. The fact that I clicked on the thread based on the title suggests an interest. My reason for not spending 2,000 hours researching a very niche topic might have something other than complete lack of interest as an explanation.
It's an insult to proclaim someone is wrong, and provide no basis for the claim other than suggesting people learn everything in the universe to arrive at the level of enlightenment you have achieved.
See how I provided specific criticism rather than say "aerohead is wrong, go study psychology and sociology"? It's comprehensive within seconds to minutes rather than an unpersuasive appeal to invest 2,000 hours into some niche subject.
Any concept that cannot be simply explained by someone demonstrates their lack of understanding of that concept, and nothing more.