View Single Post
Old 10-14-2023, 09:11 PM   #458 (permalink)
pgfpro
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,553

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 63.95 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,315
Thanked 602 Times in 391 Posts
Sorry guys it's been a while since my last post. Work has been taking up most of my spare time. Can't wait to retire in a few years so all my spare time can go into finish building the Camaro.

I ran across this a while back and wanted to share it.
https://www.hpacademy.com/technical-...OYf8BnpXka2xkU
What's weird is every single one of these modification's I did to my Talon engine back in 2014 and added a few others that weren't mentioned.

My newest data I will be logging is combustion pressure sensors. This is extremely expensive but will give me new data I need.

This Summer all my work has been focus on combustion flame speed at WOT using GEM fuel (Gasoline/Ethanol/Methanol) with Nitrous while running Lean-Burn. The Nitrous is just a small amount only 300PPH. The nitrous increases flame speed so I can run the initial timing closer to TDC. The GEM fuel has amazing anti knock characteristics but a very poor slow flame speed. It has a faster flame speed then E98 Ethanol but still not as fast as Gasoline. With Nitrous the flame speed is equal to Gasoline with great anti-knock.

Now the kicker is from my data logs and a G meter accelerometer "Dragy" it is .5 seconds faster in the 1/8th mile and the AF runs 2 points leaner using the same amount of fuel. I also conducted test with VP C16 petrol and the results were similar.

Anyway, I apologies for not getting this update sooner.
Thanks for all that follow this crazy thread.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
COcyclist (10-15-2023), deanznz (11-05-2023), freebeard (10-14-2023)