View Single Post
Old 08-01-2024, 11:27 AM   #33 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,391
Thanks: 24,469
Thanked 7,409 Times in 4,800 Posts
' 1918 '

Quote:
Originally Posted by j-c-c View Post
This is maybe pertinent but not part of my original consideration:

" Unfortunately, Royal Navy rejected his idea. The first full-deck aircraft carrier, HMS Argus, was completed in 1918 without a superstructure. As Royal Navy’s experience with Furious, which, in her original carrier configuration, had an immense superstructure in the centre of the flight deck, showed that turbulence was a significant problem for landing aircraft."
https://themaritimepost.com/2021/10/...tarboard-side/
In 1918 we'd be looking at very 'light', cloth-covered, tail-dragger, bi-wing aircraft, of rather low stall speed , which are hard enough to master 'on land.' And it's easy to imagine the challenge to landing, on the sea, and all wind variables that could be thrown at a pilot.
Add a hundred years though, and I doubt whether or not the presence of a superstructure's 'aerodynamics' could even be felt by a pilot. The 'momentum' of carrier-ready aircraft of modern-day mass and inertias would render them oblivious to a gust that could wreck an aircraft of 1918.
The 'fuel' alone, on a 1970's NAVY F-4 Phantom, would out weigh the 'total' weight of eleven Curtiss JN-4D 'Jenny' airplanes.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 08-01-2024 at 11:28 AM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote