View Single Post
Old 09-05-2024, 12:22 PM   #1618 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
' citation '

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
That's half a cite, do you have a page number or pull quote?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Younge...2Black_mats%22

The link provides argument both pro and con.
1) From World Almanac: Earth's mean radius= 3,958.8-miles.
2) From World Almanac: Earth's total surface area = 196,941,384.7-square-miles.
3) From NATURE, VOL 400, 15 July, 1999:
Earth's 'world forest equivalent' ( wfe ) = 18,801,424.27-square-miles ( of 100-year-old Oak forest carbon dioxide from oxidation ).
4) From the book, 'Too Smart for our own Good,' by Craig Dilworth, pp.311-357, the carbon dioxide emitted annually, from man's combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas, is equivalent to that emitted from combusting 18.4 wfe, or 345,956,206.6-square-miles of oak forest, divided by 196,941,384.7-square-miles/ per Earth's surface area, = 1.7565 - 'Earth' surface areas combusted/ year. One and three-quarters 'planets' 'burned' per year.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/

Last edited by aerohead; 09-05-2024 at 12:26 PM.. Reason: add data
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
freebeard (09-05-2024)