Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Lack of reporting on something isn't evidence of it's non-existence.
All of your sources share the same ideological possession.
... and the same argument can be said that negative consequences of global warming is experienced regionally, on a micro-scale.
|
Turning the table, if any 'climate benefits' were accruing, they'd be best known to the climate scientists, and already included in the calculus used to calculate GDP.
At a $38-trillion annual loss, whatever 'pluses' existed on the balance sheet, would be exponentially out-shadowed by the 'negatives.'
So 2050 would mark the 'end of growth.' From then on, the economy would continue to contract as we moved deeper into the 6th mass extinction event.
'Ockham's Razor'