View Single Post
Old 11-19-2024, 09:21 AM   #115 (permalink)
Logic
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: South Africa
Posts: 419
Thanks: 134
Thanked 186 Times in 154 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
1) 'coefficient of friction' isn't applicable in automotive lubrication.
2) 'slippery' is not a 'metric' used in tribology.
3) You poured your mixture into a 'pre-warmed engine, but a 'Cold' car.
4) You took it 'easy' ( 'easy' is not a quantifiable value which might inform the reader ).
5) Oil 'thickness' wouldn't vary in an automotive engine with 'acceptable clearances', if given its OEM-specified SAE/API motor oil. And even if the rings were shot, I'm not certain that the oil film on the cylinder walls or camshaft lobes would be appreciatively different.
6) 'About 10-km later' ( the car requires 36-km, at 88-km/h constant speed before it will attain thermal equilibrium, at which point 'testing' would be allowed to begin.
7) As I told you elsewhere, the car's fuel economy will 'improve' by 20%, without ever doing a thing to it!
8) You drove the car to 'top speed' while it was still cold, and 'exceeded' the original top speed, which would have been measured fully, thermally equilibrated; a remarkable claim, requiring equally remarkable evidence.
I did what I did and explained what I did and observed as I explained it.
Done.

If I were being paid to promote BA I might take the time to play 'court case - court case'.
But I'm done with all that.

To me it seems like nothing more than an attempt to get me to say something bannable and/or that can be nit picked at, wasting my time and causing confusion and/or information overload in anyone reading all this.

Time better spent finding a filter that blocks and hides all posts made by you.
A modification of this looks promising:
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigi..._a_particular/
I suggest you do the same.

I will however take the time to contact Dr Ali Erdemir, and other researchers, making him/them aware of this thread and quote some of the content.
I have 2 Email addresses for him so far and am in the process of writing the Email.

With any luck you might have the honour of arguing all the little details in all the correct scientific terms, with people as qualified, or more so, than your esteemed self.
Possibly even in court.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Logic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (Today)