Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
1) 'Scientific' testing of a 'smoky' engine would be oxymoronic.
|
When the wheel was invented no one did any 'Energy required to move a load of x kg y km before/after tests.
Why; because it was so much of an improvement that it was obvious to all.
I tested on a seized engine that had been 'quick fixed' by hammering the pistons out, honing the sleeves and slapping the whole mess back together.
Before the BA the car could do 80 km/h and you could not see out the rear-view mirror for smoke.
After; speed increased to ~140 km/h (rev limited) and you had to tailgate the car (driven hard) and look closely to see any smoke.
The car continued in this state for years and was eventually stolen in Cape Town.
Perhaps you have some insight into some other miraculous reason this happened as I was driving the car?
There are similar accounts by others here:
https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/techn...ngine-oil.html
What I find... 'interesting' is your seeming opposition to people trying this in a car whose engine is about to be rebuilt anyway.
What's that about..?
What do you have to loose from that happening?
vs
What you, and everyone, has to gain if, by some miracle of science, it does work??
I really don't get it.
Anyone..??