View Single Post
Old Yesterday, 10:29 AM   #330 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,461
Thanks: 24,491
Thanked 7,424 Times in 4,810 Posts
' both '

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Your unattributed comment likely in reference to permalink #318?

If you watch the whole video he does in fact test both cooked and uncooked samples of both.

(intellectual honesty by default )
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* We have no 'lab' data for either of the 'cooked' oils, so any 'test data' ascribed to them are wrapped in 'unknown quantity' status. By default.
* The 'lab' data for the ARCO oil doesn't appear to recognize the 'existence' of 'graphite', very curious! It does appear to suggest that ZDDP is in the oil, responsible for both the 'zinc' and 'phosphorous'.
* ARCO was introduced 33-years before its 'comparison' oil. ARCO was an API- SF oil, designed for cars which no longer exist, it should be 'compared' only within the context of the 'universe' as it existed in 1977, not API-SN oils, which weren't introduced until 2010, intended for model year 2011 cars.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote