Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You don't have to wait on me. Please go ahead and make ( re-make ) your case.
I've explained my path, and I'm not going to put the cart in front of the horse on account of your sense of urgency.
I'll catch up when I'm satisfied that all that are interested are armed with enough fundamental data to navigate what lies ahead.
It's a sophisticated topic, requiring a multidisciplinary background approach in order to parse out what's been reported.
It'll take the 'semester.'
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
' In order to break the rules, first you must master them'
Dali Lama, Pablo Picasso, Peter Rawlinson
|
Oh ye; 10 out of 10 for ignoring pertinent questions that don't suite you, like:
"...The research institutes who tested in engines got
6 to 10% better fuel economy in the light load situations you last insisted on..."
here.
I assume
the hope is everyone will simply forget all about this?
That's just one example of you skipping over inconvenient (for you) pertinent points/questions..
Would you like me to go back and list all of them?
Watch this question get the 'Flat Ignore' too everyone!
