View Single Post
Old 11-04-2008, 12:23 PM   #46 (permalink)
wagonman76
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Chevrolet Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 Pontiac 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Ford MAP/BP Sensor Operation and Testing

I did some reading and simple calcs and came up with the same thing as your testing. It looks like if youve got a stock cruise control, and your cruise control gets in the neighborhood of 8000 PPM like a lot of vehicles here appear to, you could just substitute the speed signal for the Ford map sensor signal. Have a switch to go between speed sensing and load sensing.

My cruise module sends a 12v signal, and senses when that signal is connected. So looks like I would need to have the Ford map sensor pulse a transistor rather than send the voltage direct to the cruise module.

This would work well in the van, at 8000 PPM. My cars are 4000 PPM, which may or may not work. Substituting a cruise module from a junkyard van into the car may work, Id just about bet theyre the same thing except for the PPM they receive.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote