Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-31-2008, 04:16 PM   #41 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
This is a really interesting modification, jomelmaldonado. Nice work, and congratulations!

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-01-2008, 06:06 PM   #42 (permalink)
Puerto Rican Hypermiler
 
jomelmaldonado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Posts: 34

Toyota Echo - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 41.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
That would be the ideal cruise control, and I think it is possible, but it would have to be programmable. At this moment I don't know how to do that, but I am studying electronics and one of my classes is going to be programming with Parallax controllers. I think that with a Parallax, it is possible to set an algorithm to control the vacuum and dump valve solenoid and that it would be monitoring both vehicle speed sensor and engine manifold vacuum. With this configuration we will achieve high MPG while still be in the legal speeds. This is called lower and upper droop setting.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jomelmaldonado For This Useful Post:
Purple004 (01-17-2010)
Old 11-03-2008, 09:10 PM   #43 (permalink)
EcoMod Wannabe
 
Sean T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Orion, MI
Posts: 448

Taurusaurus Rex - '97 Ford Taurus GL (Sedan)
90 day: 19.39 mpg (US)

Blue Wagon - '00 Ford Taurus Wagon SE Comfort
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 11 Posts
This is really cool! Just wanted to let somebody know that the link on the front page of EM (leading to Jomel's first post) does not work. I am guessing it might be because his post is on the second page.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 09:51 PM   #44 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Sean- thanks for the heads-up on that. It's a bug in vBulletin. That post "permalink" link doesn't actually work very well on multi-page threads, as you guessed.

Anyway - fixed!
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2008, 09:58 PM   #45 (permalink)
Addicted
 
bbjsw10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Findlay,OH
Posts: 555

bbjsw10 - '91 Geo Metro Xfi
90 day: 51.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Jomelmaldonado, you are the Man!! I hated cruise control until reading about what you have done. I may have to change my Christmas wish list, and get a CC and Ford map sensor. That would be great around where I live nice and flat, Ohio (land of corn fields).

I was thinking of this the other day, when my heavy work boots were killing my FE. Guess it just takes someone with a little smarts to figure it out. I know it is not the perfect setup by far but a lot better than OEM. Great job!

Edit: Was thinking could you do something like shown on relay to enable you to switch from VSS to the Ford map? That way enabling you to select which style of cruise you would want. Or would it cause havoc with the gain settings etc.?
__________________

Last edited by bbjsw10; 11-03-2008 at 10:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 12:23 PM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
wagonman76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Lower Michigan
Posts: 1,006

Red Car - '89 Chevrolet Celebrity CL 4 door
Team Chevy
90 day: 36.47 mpg (US)

Winter Wagon - '89 Pontiac 6000 LE Wagon
90 day: 28.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 17 Times in 16 Posts
Ford MAP/BP Sensor Operation and Testing

I did some reading and simple calcs and came up with the same thing as your testing. It looks like if youve got a stock cruise control, and your cruise control gets in the neighborhood of 8000 PPM like a lot of vehicles here appear to, you could just substitute the speed signal for the Ford map sensor signal. Have a switch to go between speed sensing and load sensing.

My cruise module sends a 12v signal, and senses when that signal is connected. So looks like I would need to have the Ford map sensor pulse a transistor rather than send the voltage direct to the cruise module.

This would work well in the van, at 8000 PPM. My cars are 4000 PPM, which may or may not work. Substituting a cruise module from a junkyard van into the car may work, Id just about bet theyre the same thing except for the PPM they receive.
__________________

Winter daily driver, parked most days right now


Summer daily driver
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2008, 12:50 PM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Coast, USA
Posts: 516

B2300 - '96 Mazda B2300 SE

Focus - '05 Ford Focus ST

The red car - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 6
Thanked 77 Times in 56 Posts
Great thread! Several months ago I saw on a big-rig site that intelligent cruise is offered. I wish I could remember the site to share. Anyway the cruise adapts to the terrain (hilly/flat) and load of the rig. I think it also had a mode where it maximized economy, and the unit is somewhat tuneable.

This isn't that new and it's been done, but not offered to the masses of personal vehicles. Just the big commercial vehicles. Maybe the time is right for this for MPG optimized vehicles or for us nerds. I doubt that the general public could grasp the training needed to use an intelligent cruise. Maybe a basic version perhaps for a marketing point?
__________________
Good design is simple. Getting there isn't.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2008, 01:01 PM   #48 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indy
Posts: 10

Lex - '02 Lexus IS300 Sedan
90 day: 19.77 mpg (US)

Turblow - '88 Mazda 323 GTX

Subie - '96 Subaru Impreza Outback
90 day: 21.15 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thumbs up. Very nice work. I think a simple programmable chip could be produced for upper and lower mph. Take in the setting when CC set and then apply a +/- programmed by the user and bingo
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 09:38 PM   #49 (permalink)
Puerto Rican Hypermiler
 
jomelmaldonado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Arecibo, Puerto Rico
Posts: 34

Toyota Echo - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 41.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Hello everyone, sorry for the delay in responding the threads. In response to bbjsw10 question, it is possible to switch from Ford's MAP sensor to VSS if the frequency at witch the VSS pulses is near the 90-160 Hz that Ford MAP sensor also pulse. This could be made simply with a SPDT switch to select from the VSS or MAP sensor outputs.

In my case, I can’t do this, because my Suzuki Swift has a VSS output of 4000 PPM. The frequency range for the Ford's MAP Sensor is from 90-160 Hz, that when converted to PPM, it falls in the 8000 PPM setting, the difference it to large between each setting. But remember that Audiovox CCS-100 also has a setting to modulate speed using the Tach Signal only. This setting works perfect if the car has a manual transmission or an automatic transmission with a torque converter that has a lock-up clutch. If it has an automatic with out lock-up, it should still work, but not as precise because there's a torque converter slippage that can not be account by the CCS-100, so when going up hills, it could fall under the set speed because the RPM will be maintained constant, but the torque converter will allow a certain amount of slippage due to the fact that it doesn’t has lock-up.

So what can be done is to change DIP Switch # 3 on or off to change between constant MPG and constant MPH. I know it is impractical to change that switch on the servo motor that’s located in the engine bay area, but if you solder to wires, one over each of the terminals of DIP Switch #3, and take those 2 wires inside the cab, then connect them to a SPST switch, this way you can control it from inside the car. You have to let DIP #3 open in the servo, so you can remotely control that setting from inside the car. When you want the signal to come from the MAP sensor for constant MPG’s, leave the the SPST switch in ON position for VSS signal. If you rather prefer a constant Speed, leave SPST switch in OFF position for Tach Only, this way it will ignore the MAP sensor’s output and only pay attention to the engine's RPM.

This is the next experiment I will be doing in my car, probably in 2 weeks or sooner. I will be posting my results and the corresponding diagram. Any questions or comments please let me know. Hope this info. is useful.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2008, 07:07 PM   #50 (permalink)
Almost fuel free!
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
As far as switching the cruise control feed from the Ford MAP sensor to the stock VSS signal, would it be possible to adjust the pulses from the Ford sensor to be closer to those of the vehicle's VSS sensor pulses? Looking online quickly, it seems that you can halve the frequency output of a device by using an IC such as the LM 555 or LM 556. If the frequency could be halved, it would be possible to go back and forth between a cruise control set for MPH or MPG without the vehicle's ecu thinking that something's wrong...
Just a thought.
Also, there's a PDF available on Rostra's website that has information on VSS pulses per mile for cars from 1986 to 2007. Rostra Precision Controls, Inc. - Technical Support

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Honda IACV explained TomO Off-Topic Tech 16 12-21-2015 01:49 AM
3 ?'s (SuperMID; cruise control for Metro) Pillzilla EcoModding Central 16 03-31-2008 06:34 AM
School teams to compete in cross country MPG Challenge - Possible $1,000,000 prize ericbecky EcoModding Central 9 03-22-2008 09:15 PM
TP control? Harpo EcoModding Central 9 03-14-2008 06:54 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com