View Single Post
Old 01-28-2008, 07:48 PM   #3 (permalink)
Batman Junior
MetroMPG's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,763

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 61.98 mpg (US)

Fancy Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 58.72 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 66.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,478
Thanked 6,281 Times in 3,250 Posts
Autospeed quoted a paper written by Volvo’s Dr Simone Sebben (SAE paper 2004-01-1307) about an un-named vehicle with a total drag coefficient of 0.29.

The list of parts of the car and their contribution to total drag show the cooling system as the worst offender:

Parts ... Percentage of Total Drag

Cooling package (including radiator, intercooler, oil cooler, etc) ... 33.4%
Exterior ... 31.7%
Front wheels ... 13.1%
Rear wheels ... 6.9%
Floor ... 6.9%
Rear Axle ... 3.1%
Engine ... 3.1%
Front Suspension ... 1.4%
Exhaust ... 0.7%

Source: Modifying Under-Car Airflow, Part 1

The only red flag in that data to my eyes is the label in the graph: "including radiator, intercooler, oil cooler, etc". If the vehicle in question actually has all those components, it likely has more cooling system drag than our small cars, which only have radiators.
Latest mods: 3-cylinder Mitsubishi Mirage. EcoMods now in progress...
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown

has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote