Quote:
|
Originally Posted by skewbe
127 wh/mile doesn't seem too awful by comparison to 300. It would be like a 20mpg car compared to a 45mpg car, sort of.
Very cool all the same, the forken that is. Do you think the tesla can be hyperwatted? 10kwh/day seems a bit much. Is it as simple as crawling to minimize battery losses?
|
The Tesla is undoubtedly far more efficient battery-to-wheels than the FS is, and it would
spank the FS embarassingly in a hyperwatting competition.
I've read that their charger is a bit of an energy hog because the charging process includes actively cooling the pack while force feeding it the juice. So in a charger-to-wheels comparo, that's one reason (of several) why the FS looks relatively good.
Evidence (claim) of on-road Tesla spankness:
Quote:
Quote:
Tesla also reported the battery-to-wheel efficiency as 110 Wh/km (177 wh/mi) on an unspecified driving cycle (either a constant 60 mph (96 km/h) or SAE J1634 test[21]) - wikipedia
|