View Single Post
Old 02-26-2009, 06:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy View Post
CRX is a 4th gen civic, by the way.

.36 for the 5th gen

The slope makes all the difference.
Don't you mean .36 for the sixth generation hatch ?

When the 5th generation hatches came out, I think it was Road & Track that quoted their Cd at .31 for the hatch and .32 for the coupe * - with the VX slightly lower due to the underbody fairing in front of the bumper.


( This surprised me when I first read it, since I always thought that the coupe would be the sleeker of the two. )

I think you might be remembering the .36 figure from the article that was posted at Insight Central. It compared the efficiency of the then new Insight to the Civic Hatcback, yet did not give the year of the hatchback mentioned.
Since the article would have been written when the 6th generation hatch was out, it would make sense that they were talking about the 6th generation car.

Also, the 5th generation car has a longer roofline than the 6th which usually helps aero.

I seem to remember the Cd figures for the last generation CRX at between .31,.30,and .29 ( .31 for the base CRX, .30 for the mirror delete cars, and .29 for the HX model without the mirror, rear wiper and slimmer tires. )
  Reply With Quote