View Single Post
Old 03-16-2009, 10:12 PM   #8 (permalink)
MetroMPG
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
In Hoerner's book,he reports that the actual boundary layer thickness around trains,at the time of publication,could not be accurately deduced from formulas and would have to be established empirically from observation.
Ah ha. I've read more than a couple of quotes in Hucho that seem to be generalizations, and his train comment may be another. Maybe he's missing a few qualifications there.

It makes sense to me that a relatively "short", high speed passenger train with uniform and streamlined coaches is a different animal than a mile long, jumbled up freight train, in terms of boundary layer thickness at the end car.

Efforts to "boat tail" the passenger train are worthwhile obviously.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote