View Single Post
Old 04-06-2009, 02:27 PM   #21 (permalink)
theunchosen
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
the 95 Camaro had .33 and the "dirty old model" was not so high as .45. It had a thin strip that was not very aero friendly but it was only a foot tall by length wide and even that was slanted backwards to reduce aero restrictions.

I honestly would not be surprised if the old Camaro's had a lower Cd than .37. The reason they are not FEhas alot more to do with engine dynamics than Cd.

  Reply With Quote