01-01-2013, 01:56 PM
|
#111 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
I think I could get my Canyon to 40 MPG (summer only) if I did the following:
Air dam
Belly pan
Wheel covers
Alternator delete
Possibly 3:42 rear end ratio
Possibly wheel well skirt mods
BTW, I run all season tires year around. Nokian WR's at 52 PSI.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-16-2014, 05:23 PM
|
#112 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Skamokawa, WA
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
The 1984 Toyota Diesel Pickup 2wd got 44hwy and 4wd got 36hwy. These are hard to find today though. No 2014 trucks get more than 28 mpg. But by 2025 there light trucks must get 36.5 mpg average.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to EcoCactus For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-18-2014, 07:38 PM
|
#113 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
40 mpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler
I think I could get my Canyon to 40 MPG (summer only) if I did the following:
Air dam
Belly pan
Wheel covers
Alternator delete
Possibly 3:42 rear end ratio
Possibly wheel well skirt mods
BTW, I run all season tires year around. Nokian WR's at 52 PSI.
|
Could you tell us your:
* target speed ?
* rpm in top gear now at that speed ?
* does GM use full-synthetics all around ?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your '06 probably has a better BSFC than my '94 T-100.I've hit 39-mpg once,at 55-mph,mostly downhill from Cloudcroft,NM,to Artesia,NM,only a 85-mile run.
I have a fairly complete aero kit,including 30" of boat tail at the time.In 2012 I was seeing up to 37 mpg at 65 mph.
I kinda think the Canyon might hit 40,but you'd really have to do extreme aero mods.Weight doesn't seem to be an issue on the highway.And I'm running Hankooks at 38-psi,so your 52 psi tires ought to give you a little R-R edge.
It would be a really interesting project but you'd be looking at a few thousand man-hours of your time.You'd have to be as nuts as me!
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
Last edited by aerohead; 03-18-2014 at 07:40 PM..
Reason: add image
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-19-2014, 02:21 PM
|
#114 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
My target speed is 54-55 MPH. The nearest 65 MPH speed limit is about 80 miles from where I mostly drive. A typical 70-75 mile trip has about 55 miles with 55 MPH limit, with the rest at speed limits 25 to 45 MPH, and four miles of narrow twisty gravel road. My average mileage on such a trip is about 5% better than MPG at a steady 55 MPH. My kill switch gets a lot of use.
My tires are 2% oversize, so current gearing is 1800 RPM at 55 MPH with a 3.73 rear end ratio. Most summer highway driving is at 6 to 9 PSI MAP, which is why I think a taller rear axle ratio would help.
I've never looked up the lubricant specs. Engine oil is whatever the 10 minute oil change place puts in.
The factory air dam is well above the low points. Underneath is a collection of huge holes, with the transmission cross member a couple inches lower than anything else.
And agree on the BSFC. When I do frontal area / Cd / rolling resistance calculations, I need to use less than 0.40 lbs/hp/hr to get calculated MPG to match real world MPG.
I doubt I'll ever do it all, but I'm sure thinking about it!
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JRMichler For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-21-2014, 05:54 PM
|
#115 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
thinking about it
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler
My target speed is 54-55 MPH. The nearest 65 MPH speed limit is about 80 miles from where I mostly drive. A typical 70-75 mile trip has about 55 miles with 55 MPH limit, with the rest at speed limits 25 to 45 MPH, and four miles of narrow twisty gravel road. My average mileage on such a trip is about 5% better than MPG at a steady 55 MPH. My kill switch gets a lot of use.
My tires are 2% oversize, so current gearing is 1800 RPM at 55 MPH with a 3.73 rear end ratio. Most summer highway driving is at 6 to 9 PSI MAP, which is why I think a taller rear axle ratio would help.
I've never looked up the lubricant specs. Engine oil is whatever the 10 minute oil change place puts in.
The factory air dam is well above the low points. Underneath is a collection of huge holes, with the transmission cross member a couple inches lower than anything else.
And agree on the BSFC. When I do frontal area / Cd / rolling resistance calculations, I need to use less than 0.40 lbs/hp/hr to get calculated MPG to match real world MPG.
I doubt I'll ever do it all, but I'm sure thinking about it!
|
I tried to run some numbers for the Canyon,but the lower speed mix complicates things.Taking a simple average of your winter/summer mpg increase we're looking at a 35% mpg gain.
If this were all done a steady 55-mph,we'd have to see a 70% drag reduction to explain it.
If the Canyon started at Cd 0.40,then you'd be at about Cd 0.12 according to the formulas.
If you're seeing north of 37 already in the summer,40 seems doable.
The T-100 responded really well to the nose and airdam.With the current tires,no headlight covers,none of the bellypan,and no boat tail,I'm seeing 29.6 mpg @ up to 75 mph,turning 2850 rpm.
At a maximum 70 mph,she's 30.4 mpg.She turns 2,000 rpm @ 55 mph.A sixth gear would be nice.Taller gears would probably help the Canyon as well,just as you've mentioned.The lower airdam I'm certain would help.
Some cardboard and duct tape mods might show some results as it did on the Dodge truck and CRX,and other member projects.With the OBD-II electronics it wouldn't take you long to see any changes.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-22-2014, 03:53 PM
|
#116 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
My rolling resistance goes way up in winter. Because of that, aero improvements won't do a lot to improve winter mileage. I have not tried to track down where the cold weather rolling resistance is coming from. Something about crawling around underneath in below zero temperatures is just not appealing to me.
In summer, my MPG drops about 20% from 55 to 65 MPH. I've never run at 65 long enough to get good numbers.
I do have a spare front bumper that I could use to build a conveyor belt air dam. I'm trying to decide if I should go down as far as the front cross member and A-arms, or as far as the transmission cross member.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
03-22-2014, 04:37 PM
|
#117 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by EcoCactus
The 1984 Toyota Diesel Pickup 2wd got 44hwy and 4wd got 36hwy. These are hard to find today though. No 2014 trucks get more than 28 mpg. But by 2025 there light trucks must get 36.5 mpg average.
|
US EPA (old version) is 30 city and 30 highway for the highest rated 84 Toyota diesel pickup. New EPA is lower. To get 44 MPG in that truck you would need to be going 30 MPH in top gear with no traffic obstructions.
Compare Old and New MPG Estimates
regards
Mech
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-24-2014, 06:49 PM
|
#118 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
30 hwy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
US EPA (old version) is 30 city and 30 highway for the highest rated 84 Toyota diesel pickup. New EPA is lower. To get 44 MPG in that truck you would need to be going 30 MPH in top gear with no traffic obstructions.
Compare Old and New MPG Estimates
regards
Mech
|
This sounds right.In 1986,while helping build a college chum's home near Colorado Springs,we spent a lot of time in his Toyota Diesel p'up.At the old double-nickel speed limit,at altitude,I believe we never saw north of 33-mpg,And we were trying hard.He's driving a Prius today.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-26-2014, 11:55 PM
|
#119 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I did not read the entire thread, but if you decide on a mini-truck, look for a old Dodge Rampage, it's front wheel drive and you could swap in a VW Turbo-Diesel. And of course, do all the other eco-mods you can. Only down fall I could see beside carrying/towing capacity, is it has no rear end so your re-gearing options are very limited (trans swap would be your only option, besides taller tires).
|
|
|
|