Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2023, 09:24 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 390
Thanks: 64
Thanked 163 Times in 138 Posts
So, my calculus is rather simple, if wider tires stop me say 8'? quicker, that is a potential huge amount damage/injury/time/aggravation/liability/etc savings in an accident that no mileage gains can ever offset.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to j-c-c For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (10-04-2023)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-04-2023, 10:18 AM   #12 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phase View Post
the tire size on the new 2023 prius LE is P195/60R17

what are your estimates in fuel economy improvement if dropping those down to 15 inch wheels?
The differences between make/models of tires is much larger than the difference in tire size within a given make/model. So no one can provide an estimate that doesn't have a huge amount of error.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2023, 10:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by j-c-c View Post
So, my calculus is rather simple, if wider tires stop me say 8'? quicker, that is a potential huge amount damage/injury/time/aggravation/liability/etc savings in an accident that no mileage gains can ever offset.
Yeah, that's always the conundrum. There is a risk and a cost no matter what you choose.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2023, 01:41 PM   #14 (permalink)
High Altitude Hybrid
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Gunnison, CO
Posts: 1,991

Avalon - '13 Toyota Avalon HV
90 day: 40.45 mpg (US)

Prius - '06 Toyota Prius
Thanks: 1,059
Thanked 549 Times in 440 Posts
Ya, cars, especially EV's, are getting heavier and more aerodynamic to the point that it's closer to 50% the energy used up by tires, although, it's complicated.

Even with regenerative braking, you're also still losing some energy to braking, so that's something to keep in mind.

The speed also makes a huge difference, as we all already know. At 75mph your wind drag is going to be more than rolling resistance in a Tesla. At 25mph, your rolling resistance is going to be more. What you average out to will depend on how and where you drive.

That being said, better rolling resistance is better, whether you're going 25mph or 75mph or 3mph or 87.3mph.

However, I'm of the mindset that traction trumps rolling resistance. If they can invent a tire that does well on pavement, water, ice and snow and get great rolling resistance, then awesome! But if not, I'll take the best traction possible over any amount of good rolling resistance. Right now I'm rocking some General Altimax 365's, an all season, all weather tire that has excellent snow and ice traction.

I do have another set of studded snow tires, but depending on how well the Altimax 365's do this winter, I may get a set of dedicated summer tires on those rims instead for better pavement traction and keep the snow-capable tires on during the Colorado traction law period of the year (September 1 - May 31).
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2023, 01:51 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,751
Thanks: 7,796
Thanked 8,596 Times in 7,079 Posts
Quote:
Yeah, that's always the conundrum. There is a risk and a cost no matter what you choose.
When you weigh happenstance against certainty, beefing up the sway bars might tilt the balance.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2023, 03:29 PM   #16 (permalink)
Somewhat crazed
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,093
Thanks: 470
Thanked 1,118 Times in 987 Posts
Tire for all seasons: might i suggest the contitrac plus AS at only $250.00 each
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piotrsko For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (10-04-2023)
Old 10-04-2023, 07:42 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 390
Thanks: 64
Thanked 163 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
When you weigh happenstance against certainty, beefing up the sway bars might tilt the balance.
The way some drive, "happenstance" might be a bit of an understatement.

Not sure of your intended use of the word "balance" here, ie regarding the conflict of chance vs certainty discussion or the say F/R balance of the vehicle, because beefing up a sway seldom except in the most extreme cases of body roll does a sway bar increase overall traction of a vehicle and almost never in a braking/accident avoidance situation..

Last edited by j-c-c; 10-05-2023 at 08:37 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2023, 10:17 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,908
Thanks: 23,993
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
Chevrolet BOLT quanta

I ran an energy balance for the Chevy BOLT:
1) @ 40-mph, R-R is approximately 3.595-horsepower road load, to 3.48-horsepower for aero.
2) @ 85-mph, which is a legal speed in Texas, on certain toll-roads, R-R is 7.63- horsepower, while aero is 33.39- horsepower.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The velocity-cubed power law for aero really rears it's ugly head at speed.
Which makes assigning a one-size-fits-all relationship between R-R & aero problematic.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Hersbird (10-05-2023)
Old 10-05-2023, 10:51 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 390
Thanks: 64
Thanked 163 Times in 138 Posts
And in accident-avoidance braking distance calculations, which tire size is a direct factor, speed is squared.

Also I believe it's worth noting, we can assume within normal ranges/surfaces wheel diameter has little effect on rolling resistance or power consumption at steady speeds, but it's mainly determined by frontal area, shape (motorcycle tire vs car), rubber compound, tread pattern, tire aspect, inflation, temperature, load, and road surface.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2023, 12:54 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,751
Thanks: 7,796
Thanked 8,596 Times in 7,079 Posts
Quote:
Not sure of your intended use of the word "balance" here
Prolly a play on words. OTOH, some accidents are roll-overs.

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerodynamics, drag, electric car, tires, wheels





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com