02-19-2010, 04:41 PM
|
#51 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
I found a picture of the Mercedes 170H chassis, like the one used in the Schlörwagen:
And here's the Wikipedia section on the Mercedes 170H:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rear-En...70_H_.28W28.29
It is mentioned that it had lousy handling, and the it (probably) was worked on by Dr. Porsche.
Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 02-19-2010 at 04:49 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-19-2010, 04:49 PM
|
#52 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Denmark, Europe
Posts: 338
Thanks: 138
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
|
No wonder that the car could be unstable in sidewinds. Too little weight at the front axele, and too much weight behind the rear axle.
Nice picture of the chassis.
|
|
|
02-19-2010, 07:54 PM
|
#53 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Jyden -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyden
No wonder that the car could be unstable in sidewinds. Too little weight at the front axele, and too much weight behind the rear axle.
Nice picture of the chassis.
|
But isn't that the standard issue VW bug configuration? :
Maybe it would have been better if it had the VW torsion bar front end (I'm assuming it didn't from Neil's picture)?!?!?
CarloSW2
|
|
|
02-20-2010, 04:35 PM
|
#54 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
I think the VW had a "Z-bar" rear suspension but the Merc had swing axles as used in their GP cars of the time. I seem to recall the 50s cars had a low pivot swing axle, which was slightly better.
Swing axles = evil.
See Triumph GT6 for a worked example of why it's so bad.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
02-20-2010, 06:12 PM
|
#55 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
As I've pondered the 170H chassis picture, I think you can see a bit of a blower, to the right and forward of the engine, that could be the cooling system? It seems like there has to be an active cooling system, because the are only a small set of louvers visible on the rear of the car. So, it seems likely that the intake and exhaust of the cooling system would be on the bottom of the car? And that makes me think it had to have a fan moving the air over the cooling radiator.
If they were moving toward production of this car in 1939, then it would have to be cooling at least well enough much of the time...
Someone should build this car as a modern EV! With the other adjustments in the width, and safety structure, of course...
|
|
|
02-21-2010, 03:58 AM
|
#56 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747
Thanks: 1,325
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
This is my favorite picture. I think it needs a caption :
Pilly, we need to talk ...
|
Did you notice the resemblance?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
|
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-21-2010, 04:51 AM
|
#57 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: british columbia Canada
Posts: 102
Thanks: 24
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
Thanks for posting ,great stuff!
|
|
|
02-21-2010, 12:25 PM
|
#58 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I suggest looking up the Czech automaker Tatra. Under chief engineer Hans Ledwinka, they licensed the the work of Paul Jaray, and produced a series of streamlined, rear-engined, air-cooled sedans that ran from 1934 T-77 to 1973, the last year of the T-603, under the Soviets. These cars were so unusually styled and futuristic for the time that they used a 1937 T87 on Battlestar Galactica.
|
|
|
02-21-2010, 03:39 PM
|
#59 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The Wet Coast, Kanuckistan.
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 100
Thanked 306 Times in 178 Posts
|
Front suspension was transverse leaf spring. The track was quite narrow and the car quite wide which would also be very bad for handling. Centre of lift would have been over the front axle.
Another snippet from an excellent and very long article about the MB rear engine models. Rear-engine Mercedes-Benz vehicles of the 1930s | Mercedes 500SEC.com
Quote:
Measures to produce a special-purpose version of the 170 H got under way even quicker, the model’s chassis being used by Karl Schlör at the Aerodynamic Research Institute Göttingen (AVA) to develop a streamlined body on behalf of the Reich Ministry of Transport. This was custom-built by the coachbuilding firm of Gebr. Ludewig in Essen. This prototype vehicle achieved a top speed of 146 km/h on the Frankfurt – Darmstadt autobahn, over an average of three timed runs. At the 1939 IAMA the car, which had the unusual feature of a centrally-positioned driver’s seat, was available for test drives by anyone interested from the motor industry.
|
__________________
Vortex generators are old tech. My new and improved vortex alternators are unstoppable.
"It’s easy to explain how rockets work but explaining the aerodynamics of a wing takes a rocket scientist.
|
|
|
02-22-2010, 01:32 AM
|
#60 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
orange4boy -
Quote:
Originally Posted by orange4boy
Front suspension was transverse leaf spring. The track was quite narrow and the car quite wide which would also be very bad for handling. Centre of lift would have been over the front axle.
...
|
Oh, duh, I forgot about that. Sounds like a job for wide-track integrated front wheel covers. But now you lose the front/rear wheel inlining.
Piwoslaw -
Scary but true :
CarloSW2
Last edited by cfg83; 02-22-2010 at 02:08 AM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|