Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-03-2024, 06:18 PM   #1 (permalink)
lead foot
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 110
Thanks: 2
Thanked 55 Times in 33 Posts
High compression on low octane

It's been a while but this seems to be the place to ask "dumb ass questions" per FB K series groups.

I have a K swapped Insight with the goal of power AND economy, I've had a K20a3 with 11.5: compression and 5psi of boost, 3.4 final drive and while its a blast to drive I average 30mpg with 40mpg being my tank record. Meh

I now have a K24a4 on the stand and will be swapping it in next year. No turbo, well muffled. Stock compression is 9.7:1 and made for 87 octane.

I'm interested in running higher compression on 87. TSX engine is 10.5:1 which seems possible. what about higher?

My thought are that the car is almost half the weight of the original Element/Accords the engine came from so the load will be less.

My other idea is to add EGR to the system and control it with Kpro or maybe another means.

Also FWIW I fully expect less power than my current setup and I'm cool with that, I have other cars for that.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_4788.jpg
Views:	5
Size:	61.1 KB
ID:	35251   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_8114.jpg
Views:	7
Size:	106.8 KB
ID:	35252  
__________________
2001 Insight 11.5:1 K20a3 turbo / 04 Element
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old Yesterday, 03:06 AM   #2 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,599

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,353
Thanked 797 Times in 475 Posts
The original Insight engine was 10.8:1 and only required 87 octane. But I don't know how that translates to a K-series.

I've driven a manual K24 CR-V and really enjoyed the engine. It's gotta be awesome in a lighter car! Cheap and torquey! But I think I'll be sticking with the 64 MPG 3-cyl.
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro

  Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 04:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,016

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 49.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BongoBennie View Post
I'm interested in running higher compression on 87. TSX engine is 10.5:1 which seems possible. what about higher?

Also FWIW I fully expect less power than my current setup and I'm cool with that, I have other cars for that.
The engine in my previous GMC Canyon had, if I recall correctly, 10:1 or 10.5:1 compression. It ran well on 87 octane. The best ambient temperature for gas mileage was about 70 deg F. It lost about 1 MPG per 10 deg F at lower temperatures. The mileage did not improve at higher temperatures. I think that the knock sensor was retarding ignition timing at temperatures above 70 deg F.

I saw timing as retarded as 2 deg after TDC at high manifold pressure and low RPM, and as advanced as 45 deg BTDC at low manifold pressure and higher RPM. That engine would slowly and smoothly accelerate from 21 MPH in fifth gear, which was about 600 RPM.

Your higher compression should be possible. Pay careful attention to ignition timing vs RPM, intake air temperature, engine temperature, and manifold pressure to prevent detonation. You may need a knock sensor to get your timing fully dialed in. I would not be surprised if getting smooth running at low RPM required ignition timing a few degrees ATDC at higher manifold pressures.

If you are happy with less power, try a camshaft with delayed intake valve closing to get some Atkinson cycle effect.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:17 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: South Africa
Posts: 353
Thanks: 117
Thanked 155 Times in 126 Posts
BYD serial hybrids with direct top gear have an ICE running 16 to 1 compression,
I posted about it here"
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...6-a-41587.html

The only other place I have seen talk of successfully increased compression without ping is here:
https://turbobricks.com/index.php?th...y-tried.66779/

I would say low hanging fruit is you want your intake charge as cool as you can get it.
In a dry climate; using an Ultrasonic Mist Maker (or Pond Mister) or 10 to produce max mist for per 'space required' for evaporation in the intake may work.


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com