Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-04-2011, 09:47 PM   #31 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BamZipPow View Post
From a safety aspect...don't do that. There are specific safety catches on the fenders that are there to prevent the hood from flying over the vehicle in a front end collision.

Yer better off building it up from foam/Coroplast sheeting...
Not over the vehicle but through the head/neck area of the passenger compartment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
That's not really a deflector... The hood just happens to cover up the wipers in the parked position.
That may be most of what a window deflector does, is puts a draggy item (the wipers) under a fairer surface.

__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-04-2011, 09:51 PM   #32 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I would invite others to make a hood splitter like I did and check your mileage. Imagine your vehicle from the top down rather than just from the side. My design was not intended to cover the wipers. Using coroplast is a very crude way of testing. I am going to make one that blends into the hood next.

Here is my trike at speed, it has the same canopy as my varna.


Ever stick your fingers out the window and feel the air flow at the surface of the roof line your car. At the windshield the air is strong right at the surface. As you drift your fingers back a foot or two back from the windshield top; you can feel the major flow move outward a couple of inches. Anything we do to help keep the flow attached is going to make the car go through the air better.

If you want to prove this wrong then start recording your mileage and doing your own testing.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2011, 09:52 PM   #33 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb View Post
Not over the vehicle but through the head/neck area of the passenger compartment.
No, they actually place the trailing edge of the hood at just above the dash... In line with your head. They're there to ensure that the hood crumples, rather than just disconnecting at the chassis and becoming a projectile.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2011, 10:04 PM   #34 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
No, they actually place the trailing edge of the hood at just above the dash... In line with your head. They're there to ensure that the hood crumples, rather than just disconnecting at the chassis and becoming a projectile.
Yea to keep it there rather than flying off, or coming straight back. I have looked at mine several times, and that's the best I can come up with. Departing the vehicle is not much of a concern, departing and impinging into the occupants that's worth the engineering effort to put hooks on the hood.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2011, 10:14 PM   #35 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I can't tell enough from the Camaro pic to comment on it, but that region is known to not have high attached flow.

By all means, let's see some rigorous testing, and by that I mean, testing that lasts further than half a tank, is repeatable, and is accurate. Or, let's see data from the pros; either one will do.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 03:31 PM   #36 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I can't tell enough from the Camaro pic to comment on it, but that region is known to not have high attached flow.

By all means, let's see some rigorous testing, and by that I mean, testing that lasts further than half a tank, is repeatable, and is accurate. Or, let's see data from the pros; either one will do.

Well of course it's not known to have attached flow-- because on most vehicles it's a sharp transition, so a bubble of air forms there.

This truck didn't have attached flow from the front to the sides until NASA put curved fairings on it
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 03:34 PM   #37 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Those are two different situations. Completely different.

So I'd wager hood blisters don't really affect the flow upstream and downstream... so then what?
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 04-05-2011 at 03:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 03:36 PM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
I can't find any better pics of the Camaro hood and windshield.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 04:15 PM   #39 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Those are two different situations. Completely different.

So I'd wager hood blisters don't really affect the flow upstream and downstream... so then what?
Well the blister looks too narrow, but I think a gradual transition between the hood and the windshield would obviously allow air to flow smoothly and stay attached, rather than forming a high pressure bubble. I've seen people on this forum say that the bubble means aerodynamics in that spot don't matter, but it seems to me that it's the opposite.

Look the Aptera, Prius, and other aerodynamic cars. The hood is almost the same angle as the windshield so there probably is smooth continuous flow. The question how close to the same angle ideal you can get with a fairing that doesn't connect to the windshield.

Making the transition gradual with a curve has to help. It takes energy to force air to change direction, but less energy if you direct it gradually. Just look at intake pipes, sewage pipes, etc etc... Gradual curves, not right angle elbows.

Last edited by winkosmosis; 04-05-2011 at 04:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 05:51 PM   #40 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Look at any wind tunnel image with the smoke trails... they sure look to be arcing smoothly up at the hood/windshield to me...

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com