Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-24-2010, 04:51 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
Thanks Jyden and Piwoslaw,
We have very mild Winters by comparison so one tyre is used all year.

Cheers , Pete.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-11-2010, 11:15 AM   #22 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Ecobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Ecobalt's Reason #14--Winter wheels weigh more

I have winter tires mounted on steel rims. The wheels each weigh five pounds more than my aluminum alloy wheels. Backpackers have an expression: "an ounce on your boots is like another pound on your back". There is an analogy to the rotating wheels. The rotational momentum of the car's wheels has to be achieved by burning gasoline and it is lost when you brake.

In any case, it is always advantageous to take twenty pounds off yof our automobile.

I am not so sure that winter tires have a higher rolling resistance by nature. The evaluation at Green Seal puts several snow tires at the top of the list.

I have a theory that the very supple Bridgestone Blizzak tires have a low rolling resistance because they flex when going over an obstruction or a pebble. Blizzak tires are gas-blown (Bridgestone calls it microcell) as part of the ice traction features. Cyclists select tires with a "supple carcass" that flexes for low rolling resistance. To achieve that, I shop for a high thread count in bicycle tires.

See table 1
http://www.greenseal.org/resources/r...Resistance.pdf

Last November, I bought ExtremeWinterContact™ snow tires. Evaluations told me that those tires had higher rolling resistance than the competitors. I bought them for the price and longevity. The snow and ice traction was superb and the dry road handling was better than the Blizzaks. When I removed those tires and steel wheels and put on the OEM Continental tires and Konig wheels, my fuel economy improved by 3 mpg.

Last edited by Ecobalt; 09-11-2010 at 12:34 PM.. Reason: ExtremeWinterContact™
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 09:54 AM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,429

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 89
Thanked 89 Times in 74 Posts
16~ the vast majority of People are unable to control thir vehicles in Snow, so you have to maintain a lower speed to avoid all the wheelspinning idiots.

17~You may lug the engine in slippery conditions for maximum traction (my Scab will pull 5th at 35mph- thats about 1000rpm)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 10:32 AM   #24 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I love thread bumps!

For me, air temperature is a real killer. My transmission won't go to lock up torque convertor unless it gets warm. In warm weather that is about 2 miles, in the winter it can be over 10. And with a normal commute of 9 miles, that makes the transmission keep the engine revs a bit high.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 12:39 PM   #25 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
Mine won't even enter 4th gear until it's warmed up for several miles, and then it won't lock up for several more. I miss my bike sometimes for it actually responding to my commands.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 07:18 PM   #26 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I'd alter my transmission to think it was always warm enough to lock up, but for fear of damaging something. Simply finding the correct amount of resistance to simulate a 180* transmission would be simple, but does locking up the TC when it is cold do any harm? I suspect it is an attempt to get the engine warmer faster in part, but it is hard to know without knowing automatics as intricately as I'd like to.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2010, 07:36 PM   #27 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
There's another very important component that doesn't perform as well when it's cold: the driver.

Related to #10, traction batteries (not just PbA) offer much less performance when it's cold. I can hardly regen when mine's below freezing, and I had much less capacity than I was expecting today.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2010, 06:57 AM   #28 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
#16 Lack of an enclosed garage.

Basic for vehicle longevity (true economy) in all seasons/climates. But especially so in winter.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
ShadeTreeMech (12-26-2010)
Old 12-08-2010, 07:04 AM   #29 (permalink)
dcb
needs more cowbell
 
dcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038

pimp mobile - '81 suzuki gs 250 t
90 day: 96.29 mpg (US)

schnitzel - '01 Volkswagen Golf TDI
90 day: 53.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
"true" economy?!?
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2010, 09:21 AM   #30 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Ecobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 41
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcb View Post
"true" economy?!?
Think "big picture", total cost of ownership and conservation of the resources needed to produce an automobile.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecobalt For This Useful Post:
ShadeTreeMech (12-26-2010)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com