03-16-2014, 09:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Travel Trailer
Posts: 26
X - '02 Ford Excursion Limited
Thanks: 18
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Nuclear cars
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 08:56 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,643
Thanks: 1,502
Thanked 279 Times in 229 Posts
|
They tried this for aircrafts, but it would contaminate the air that passed through the engine, the crew and those on the ground.
Maybe it should be left for satellites, submarines and aircraft carriers?
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 10:56 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Totally unlikely - can you imagine a core meltdown after an accident?
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 10:57 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
Somebody came up with an idea for a hafnium fueled nucleonic reactor for powering a turbine. Its radiocontamination would have been marginal. And the shielding requirement is a lot lower too, so it's light enough to actually, you know, fly. I think I saw that in Popular Science a few years ago. <researches> Can't find it.
I also saw a concept for a huge - seriously, makes Hindenburg look like a minnow - dirigible that would use a nuclear power plant for propulsion. Since a dirigible's power requirements are so much lower (little to no energy required to generate lift, for instance) and the aircraft so large, the plant's more modest ratings and physical separation from crew and passengers also limit the exposure to radiation. I have that in a book but don't have a scanner to upload a picture, sorry.
Using hydrogen for a lifting gas would also add to the shielding. Yes, there are certain risks associated with that.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 11:32 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Travel Trailer
Posts: 26
X - '02 Ford Excursion Limited
Thanks: 18
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
People said cars would never replace horses and the Beatles were a fad, somehow some form of energy like this will replace fossil fuels. They just need a few tweaks
|
|
|
03-17-2014, 11:36 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
My car gets its energy from the most powerful fusion reactor in the solar system.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jakobnev For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-17-2014, 08:26 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Salt Spring Island, BC, Canada
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
My car gets its energy from the most powerful fusion reactor in the solar system.
|
On a different board, the technophiles were out in full force. They decided that fusion power could be used to desalinate sea water and deliver it thousands of miles inland for irrigating crops.
"They've already done that," someone added, "It's called 'rain!'"
|
|
|
03-18-2014, 01:32 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
My car gets its energy from the most powerful fusion reactor in the solar system.
|
The solar system is pretty big, but think how far you would need to go to find a more powerful one! You very well might need a good reactor of your own to get there!
|
|
|
03-18-2014, 08:43 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Solar system is part of the galaxy, and there is only one star in our solar system.
|
|
|
|