Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-02-2015, 03:23 PM   #41 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It cost each man,woman,and child in the USA 36-cents to finance the govt. portion.
The per-individual cost isn't the issue, the fact that the total price tag is as big as it is, is the issue. Paring the per-person costs down to make them look small is how the government keeps spending such tremendous amounts of money, denouncing the expenditures as mere drops in each of our buckets. My point is that that drop, like so many others, could have been much smaller or even non-existent.

You have yourself posted photos of NASA's aeromodding experiments, there's the Bullet Truck to draw examples from, and of course Luigi Colani's body of work is out there. There's an awful lot of information on the whole topic already available, an awful lot of work has already been done, and this study group went and did it again. If that's how they economize effort and brains, is it any wonder they didn't do as well as an independent research group has already done? An independent research group with a budget only a fraction of the size, I might add.

It isn't that we, each American citizen, got ripped off to the tune of 36 cents. It's that we, the American tax base, got a piss-poor return for our $115 million dollars.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
Flakbadger (04-02-2015), mikeyjd (04-06-2015), Shepherd777 (04-06-2015), UltArc (04-03-2015), Vman455 (04-07-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-02-2015, 05:28 PM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,562
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 8,554 Times in 7,041 Posts
Yeah, I want to see a grudge match between the Supertruck and a Colani.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2015, 06:43 PM   #43 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
big

Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The per-individual cost isn't the issue, the fact that the total price tag is as big as it is, is the issue. Paring the per-person costs down to make them look small is how the government keeps spending such tremendous amounts of money, denouncing the expenditures as mere drops in each of our buckets. My point is that that drop, like so many others, could have been much smaller or even non-existent.

You have yourself posted photos of NASA's aeromodding experiments, there's the Bullet Truck to draw examples from, and of course Luigi Colani's body of work is out there. There's an awful lot of information on the whole topic already available, an awful lot of work has already been done, and this study group went and did it again. If that's how they economize effort and brains, is it any wonder they didn't do as well as an independent research group has already done? An independent research group with a budget only a fraction of the size, I might add.

It isn't that we, each American citizen, got ripped off to the tune of 36 cents. It's that we, the American tax base, got a piss-poor return for our $115 million dollars.
So at 23-million a year we got:
*115% mpg improvement instead of 50%
*Hybrid
*Hermetic AC
*Waste heat recovery-electric generation
*Photovoltaic power augmentation
*Active telemetry/transmission,smart-shifting
*Active aerodynamics
*Active suspension
*Custom chassis
*Exotic lightweight materials
*Smart steering
I'm no manufacturing engineer,but this seems like a bargain to me.One international space station toilet/year.
Some automakers spend $ 2-billion on advertising each year which doesn't do me any good.That's $ 10-billion over the same period.
I'm excited to drop 36-cents if it means getting the USA off imported oil.
If it gets my air within the Clean Air Act standards,my annual inspection fee will be $12 instead of $39.50.That's worth more than $115-million right there.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (04-02-2015), bikeprof (04-05-2015), mcrews (04-05-2015), mikeyjd (04-06-2015), sendler (04-03-2015), wdb (04-05-2015)
Old 04-04-2015, 11:19 PM   #44 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Bicycle Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: N. Saskatchewan, CA
Posts: 1,803

Appliance White - '93 Geo Metro 4-Dr. Auto
Last 3: 42.35 mpg (US)

Stealth RV - '91 Chevy Sprint Base
Thanks: 91
Thanked 459 Times in 327 Posts
To me, the big news on this item is breaking 50% thermal efficiency on the road. That used to be the province of ship's diesels.
Has anybody seen a picture of the back end, or the detailing between tractor and trailer?
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bicycle Bob For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-06-2015), mcrews (04-05-2015)
Old 04-05-2015, 01:36 AM   #45 (permalink)
Wannabe hyper..., miler !
 
bikeprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pagosa Springs & Phoenix
Posts: 186

White Variant - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDI ~ GLS- 4 Cyl

Minivan - '96 Chrysler handicap IMS built LXI

Insight - '10 Honda Insight EX
Thanks: 146
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
Trucking is as advanced a Barney or Fred were back in those days...
Still pushing the same(but somewhat better machines), down the road.

I'm ALL for improvement but there are sooo many factors involved and the #1 here is:
Owner/driver of the equipment.

Change a bulb, not much light difference is noted BUT change a mind and MANY things can be done.
For instance the "super singles"; better FE, less maintenance, tracking and turning performance, etc... and how have they been accepted. Not too well...

Hybrid buses are flowing every day in most cities here in the USA, why not some 18 wheelers, hmmm?

Last edited by bikeprof; 04-05-2015 at 02:35 AM.. Reason: Extra info
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2015, 07:18 AM   #46 (permalink)
0.29 Cd and decreasing
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 184

Red Rocket - '90 honda CRX HF
Team Honda
Team "Old SKOOL"
90 day: 53.46 mpg (US)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bikeprof View Post
Trucking is as advanced a Barney or Fred were back in those days...
Still pushing the same(but somewhat better machines), down the road.

I'm ALL for improvement but there are sooo many factors involved and the #1 here is:
Owner/driver of the equipment.

Change a bulb, not much light difference is noted BUT change a mind and MANY things can be done.
For instance the "super singles"; better FE, less maintenance, tracking and turning performance, etc... and how have they been accepted. Not too well...

Hybrid buses are flowing every day in most cities here in the USA, why not some 18 wheelers, hmmm?
My assumption is that most 18wheelers are owned by a company or by an individual owner. Which they aren't willing to get out the 6-figure checkbook for whole/partial hybrid 18wheeler fleet or even just one hybrid 18wheeler when they have a whole fleet of diesels that work just fine.

And with the buses, I'm sure that most of the bus companies have deals with the state/county/city where they get a large amount of their funding from. Then these bus companies ask for more money from the state/county/city (s) so they can get a full/partial hybrid fleet. Which, as was mentioned earlier, is $900k but is "only" 15 cents per person of tax increases (Not real numbers).
And now the state/county/city can go flaunt around saying that their buses are hybrid and make themselves look better... AT OUR COST.

Don't get me wrong, I see the buses here in Sacramento have been transferring over to natural gas from gasoline or diesel. Even a number of them are a natural gas hybrid, and are really comfy on the inside! The bus and light rail are really convenient and is easy for me at all times because i pay for a commuter pass with my college tuition.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to tvbd56 For This Useful Post:
bikeprof (04-06-2015)
Old 04-05-2015, 10:32 AM   #47 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
To me, the big news on this item is breaking 50% thermal efficiency on the road. That used to be the province of ship's diesels.
Has anybody seen a picture of the back end, or the detailing between tractor and trailer?
Freightliner SuperTruck has a lot more details but it is so loaded with gimmickry that its driving my aging pooter a bit bonky. It does mention camera mirrors. The images I've managed to load also suggest that the back of the trailer has rounded corners.

EDIT: I got one of the videos to run. The back of the cab is very conventional. It appears as though the magic is in the fairings, and perhaps the front surface of the trailer.

ANOTEHR EDIT: Oh wow, now they're saying that over 2/3 of the improvement in fuel economy came from the trailer! Talk about bang for buck...

FINAL EDIT, I PROMISE: Found an image of the back of the trailer. It has the foldout extensions very much like I've seen on trucks around here. It also says the fairings on the cab between the cab and trailer are 'articulating', which implies that they move in response to some input or another.

Last edited by wdb; 04-05-2015 at 10:44 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wdb For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-06-2015), mcrews (04-05-2015)
Old 04-06-2015, 12:22 AM   #48 (permalink)
Wannabe hyper..., miler !
 
bikeprof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pagosa Springs & Phoenix
Posts: 186

White Variant - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDI ~ GLS- 4 Cyl

Minivan - '96 Chrysler handicap IMS built LXI

Insight - '10 Honda Insight EX
Thanks: 146
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
As you know, the trailer is 8O% of the combination. LOTS of damage to the air is created by the tail end, so..., if we were to improve the tail end and create flowing instead of waterfalling, then the FUEL(in this case, FUEL/Diesel) economy would be GREAT!

I'm not going into description but many items can be done to improve the air CHAOS out of the back end.

I drove a truck,(owned few trucks), and I would try to keep the Diesel MPG's at about 7.57+(real figures) to an all time high(3 trips loaded), at 9.40 !
Mind you, '00 Freightliner Century/500 Cummins/10SP & 48' Flatbed spread, net combination lbs: 32,000+/- ~78,500 loaded
Without any MODS 'cept the nut behind the wheel.
Good stuff can come out of want and some technology :-)))))

Last edited by bikeprof; 04-06-2015 at 12:40 AM.. Reason: adding description
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 01:22 AM   #49 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,217
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdb View Post
driving my aging pooter a bit bonky.
Disabling javascript prevents many undesirables from loading.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2015, 08:03 AM   #50 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 40.02 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
I'd like to see mandated fuel economy standards for heavy trucks. Then we'll see manufacturers pushing hard with what they already know how to do, but don't.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to elhigh For This Useful Post:
bikeprof (04-06-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com