Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2011, 02:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Tire pressure and diameter

So I was searching through some EM stuff and found something that said that increasing tire pressure would increase the radius of the tire, thus requiring speedometer recalibration. It made sense that - even to a micro degree - the tire would be slightly larger.

I'm considering upping my pressure a bit. It's currently at door-frame spec (33psi), but the tires are rated for 44. I plan on starting with a jump of 2psi and gauging how much harsher the ride feels.

Will a speedometer recalibration be necessary, and is it easy to do?

If my understanding is correct, the speedo itself will read slower than I am actually traveling - correct?


Here's what I was talking about:
http://ecomodder.com/wiki/index.php/...o_max_sidewall

[/URL]/Increase_tire_pressure_to_max_sidewall
Quote:
Note: When testing MPG improvement the increased pressure will increase the tire radius therefore a scangauge or similar device will not display accurate efficiency until its recalibrated. A standard back to back test using the scangauge MPG output will not give reliable results
The ideal method of testing involves checking the amount of fuel used when traveling at constant speed between 2 defined locations for different tire pressures.


Last edited by Kodak; 04-18-2011 at 03:48 PM.. Reason: Forgot to link...
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-18-2011, 02:35 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
The difference would be marginal, I really don't think yo'd need to re-calibrate. Just keep in mind many car models are available with a variety of tire sizes, each just a little different. Even tires which *should* be the same size according to the designation ont heir sidewall can vary from each manufacturer and even between different tire patterns from the same manufacturer. For offroad cars the difference in diameter can sometimes be up to an inch!

Just increasing the tire pressure won't do much (if anything) to increase its diameter. Modern tires are all steel belted anyway, they don't 'balloon'.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to akumabito For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (04-18-2011), PaleMelanesian (04-20-2011)
Old 04-18-2011, 03:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
+1
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 06:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...FYI, the actual "rolling diameter" of the tire is typically about 97% of its' unloaded, 100%-circular diameter, and it's due to the 'contact patch' "spread-area" flat-spot on the tire bottom.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 06:23 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Ah, okay. Thanks all.

One follow-up: Will the odometer be affected at all?

If I note a small mpg improvement with this mod, I want to know that it's related to decreased rolling resistance (and longer coasts), not calculation error.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 06:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
in tents
 
dennyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 158

The Adventure Wagon - '94 Subaru Loyale Wagon 4x4
Subaru
90 day: 33.43 mpg (US)

Electro-Monkey - '11 Surly Karate Monkey BMC V2S Front Hub Motor
90 day: 694.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 31 Times in 23 Posts
You can check the difference on a stretch of highway with mileposts. Record your odometer / tripmeter to the tenth at the first milepost (123.4), then again 10 mileposts later (133.4). The difference in tenths (observed miles, 10.X, vs. actual miles, 10.0) is your odometer error in %.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 07:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
a great lil online tool for comparing tires and diameters...

Tire size calculator
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 07:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 403

Sweetie - '11 Hyundai Sonata GLS
90 day: 39.35 mpg (US)

My Miles - '03 Combo GLS/KLX/Ninja
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)

Sipper' - '04 Kawasaki Ninja 250
90 day: 74.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 37 Times in 28 Posts
With my tires at 44 psi my gps read 2.65% higher on average than my odometer.
After bumping them to 50 psi the difference jumped to 2.83%.

The change is small, but there is one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 11:24 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
I suspect these small discrepancies would also exist in other situations, such as the difference between driving a 2 mile commute on cold tires, and a 50 mile commute on mostly warm tires.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 02:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennyt View Post
You can check the difference on a stretch of highway with mileposts. Record your odometer / tripmeter to the tenth at the first milepost (123.4), then again 10 mileposts later (133.4). The difference in tenths (observed miles, 10.X, vs. actual miles, 10.0) is your odometer error in %.
I don't suppose there are any ways around this, are there? My odometer is digital and only records whole numbers.

Maybe I can do this: Set the trip odometer at the first mile marker. Then, have a passenger watch it until it changes. If it's right on the mark, we should know. But if it's off, I have another idea.

OR

If I maintain a constant 60mph (cruise)on flat ground, we can use a stopwatch to record the time it takes for the odometer to register one mile. Then, we can use the simple Rate x Time = Distance formula to hopefully uncover any discrepancies. I suppose the above can be done at any speed, but 60 would be easy.

The only variable is the amount of time it takes for the passenger to hit the stopwatch. There would be a minuscule delay, I suppose.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com