11-18-2009, 01:49 AM
|
#91 (permalink)
|
Mechanical engineer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,272
Thanks: 270
Thanked 841 Times in 414 Posts
|
This winter tire rolling resistance winner in many tests were Nokian hakkapeliitta R (New version) and the next best was Michelin XI2. Results were the same on overall test results. So i Would recommend hakkapeliitta R for new winter tires or if that is not sold then XI2.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-22-2009, 02:12 PM
|
#92 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: England
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I noticed the Dunlop Fast Response Tyres posted quite well
I'm running Dunlop Sport SP1 and I love them, quiet, good grip and good eceonomy
|
|
|
11-22-2009, 03:24 PM
|
#93 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer
Ernie,
I have no idea why you were told this, but it is not true.
The reason tire manufacturers do not give out RR data is:
1) There is no agreed upon test procedure. There are at least 4 methods that I know of and they give different numerical values - although the rank order remains the same.
This is one of the issues troubling the California Energy Commission (CEC) when they try to come up with a regulation. The test results from different sources has to be the same.
2) Different test facilities given different results. This has been looked at and it is apparent that the test facilities can be correlated - however, the "base" facility (the one everyone else has to correlate to) has to be identified and a correlation procedure developed.
It has been suggested by NHTSA (National Highway and Traffic Safety Administration) that the Federal government (NHTSA) be the regulating body rather than have 50 different regulations - and their suggestion is to use a common tire for the correlation, so every tire tested would be a percentage of that - and their preference is the SRTT (Standard Reference Test Tire) Unfortunately, this doesn't address the tire size issue.
3) RR varies by tire size. Very early in the process, the CEC was confronted with the paradox that identical tires gave different results depending on tire size - with large tires giving smaller coefficients.
This might result in "one-off" tires that are used to characterize the entire tire line. However, if it were regulated that EVERY tire size / design combination were to be tested, it would occupy EVERY test facility in the world for over a year. In other words, no new development could take place.
So, NO, the tire manufacturers DO NOT know the RR of every tire they make.
The RMA (Rubber Manufacturers Association) has not only been cooperating with both NHTSA and the CEC to come up with a workable regulation, but they've also encouraging the regulators to understand the issues involved and overcome them. The tire manufacturers - through the RMA wants something that makes sense, is usable, and consumer friendly, and not too expensive. Thus far, it has been difficult to find concensus among the various stakeholders.
Nevertheless, it is just plain wrong to characterize the RMA as "gagging" the tire manufacturers. They ARE the tire manufacturers!! and they are trying to find a way to make it work.
|
I was struck by a couple of thoughts:
1. there really are two sides to every opinion
2. Ecomodder has attracted a pretty knowledged and varied group of posters
|
|
|
11-22-2009, 04:08 PM
|
#94 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...use the California RR-value numbers! California passed a law that all new cars sold in their state must use low-RR tires, so they must have a "scoring" of "listing" of what brands and model tires are acceptable.
...of course, you'd better send along a self-addressed and stamped envelope to guarantee any possibility of getting an "...answer..." since I'm sure their 'Postal $tamps Budget' ain't what it used to be (ha,ha).
|
|
|
11-23-2009, 07:55 AM
|
#95 (permalink)
|
Tire Geek
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
...... California passed a law that all new cars sold in their state must use low-RR tires, so they must have a "scoring" of "listing" of what brands and model tires are acceptable.
......
|
I think you'll find the law did not make it through the process. It got caught up in exactly the problems I listed above.
|
|
|
11-30-2009, 05:09 AM
|
#96 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alaska
Posts: 24
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
Useful information... thank you for keeping it alive!
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 03:24 PM
|
#97 (permalink)
|
Manic Rabbit
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
so... after all this time has there ever been a re-visit to "low rolling resistance tires"? Tax refund coming, and I planning on getting new tires... 13s
__________________
-Edward
Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 03:46 PM
|
#98 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 03:58 PM
|
#99 (permalink)
|
Manic Rabbit
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
|
ya, seen that article... when I have a car with 15" (or larger) wheels I might be able to use those models of tires, any details on the Kumhos?
edit... I do see the Goodyear Integrity on thar, was hoping for a little better selection/detail on other 13" tires
__________________
-Edward
Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
|
|
|
04-14-2010, 04:03 PM
|
#100 (permalink)
|
Manic Rabbit
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 134
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Kumho eco Solus perhaps?
Kumho eco Solus HM KR22
__________________
-Edward
Driven on Colorado roads, where NOTHING is flat
Present City 3x / Highway 4x
Goal: 4x / 5x
|
|
|
|