03-27-2012, 04:00 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 625
Thanks: 40
Thanked 156 Times in 103 Posts
|
It would be nice if they would put it in a basic 2 door fiesta for $13000 but we know that's not going to happen.
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
03-27-2012, 08:29 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rokeby
"This could be used on a three-cylinder engine to make it sound like an inline
four-cylinder engine..."
|
Why would they want something that sounds like 1/4th of a V12 to sound like a tinny, droning I4? The sound of I-3s is unusual, but if you tune out the high pitches with proper exhaust tuning, the slightly off-beat note sounds properly sporting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
In North America, you can bet we won't see this engine in the Focus. Nearly 12 seconds to 100 km/h / 62 mph will be deemed "too slow". Maybe in the Fiesta though.
|
Shame... but honestly, that's not any slower than an automatic Lancer or Honda Fit. |
|
|
|
|
03-27-2012, 10:19 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 57
Thanks: 15
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky
Shame... but honestly, that's not any slower than an automatic Lancer or Honda Fit.
|
Or that turd, the 2011 Jetta 2.0 base automatic... Every time I see one, I pity the driver, then 10 seconds later I start laughing at how they got ripped off.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 01:28 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,443
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
|
That Focus is $28,000 US dollars!
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 02:26 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 57
Thanks: 15
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
I think that engine is pretty awesome, but I was wondering, why not just make a 4 cylinder 1.0L and avoid all the problems inherent to 3 cylinders?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 03:57 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
|
Efficiency, less friction, more compact design, weight, cheaper...
|
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 04:02 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
That Focus is $28,000 US dollars!
|
After 17.5% VAT tax.
Quote:
Originally Posted by A.J.
I think that engine is pretty awesome, but I was wondering, why not just make a 4 cylinder 1.0L and avoid all the problems inherent to 3 cylinders?
|
Exactly. Nobody wants to admit they blew nearly $30k on a 3 banger. Look at the Smart car. Not so smart. |
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 06:01 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 99
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
After 17.5% VAT tax.
|
UK VAT tax is currently 20%.
Quote:
|
I think that engine is pretty awesome, but I was wondering, why not just make a 4 cylinder 1.0L and avoid all the problems inherent to 3 cylinders?
|
More parts ~ less efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
03-28-2012, 07:43 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
More parts also equals smaller parts.
One of the big difficulties with direct injection is packaging. If you're going to have direct injection and more cylinders in a small package, you're going to have to sacrifice valve space to make it work. Keeping the 1.0 3 cylinders allows them to have more space in each combustion chamber to pack the valves, injector and spark plug.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
