Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2011, 01:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
1.9L VW/Audi/Skoda/SEAT Diesel Mod alert! :)

Autospeed has a new series on modding the 1.9L TDI. The first part covers taking base measurements.

Browser Warning

They tend to be performance oriented, but if you do everything they do to a diesel except turn up the fuel you'll get better economy and power too

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-25-2011, 06:20 PM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
It actually turned out in the end to be a lot more complex than just power vs fuel economy but the end result is good in both.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 08:45 PM   #3 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Julian,

I'm sure it did turn out to be more. I was just noting that for people here in this forum, they might want to avoid the turning up the fuel step to maximize economy. (I know you can get the same economy if you keep your foot out of it but if the temptation isn't there ... )

Thanks for the great articles.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2011, 08:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
As the series will (eventually) reveal, fuel economy improved after the remap.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 05:17 AM   #5 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Looking forward to the next part on making your own intake. Did you look at the PD 160 intake as this can be a direct drop-in replacement and it has much less of a change in diameter from the intake panel to the pipe.



I'm also looking forward to seeing if this improves performance. Some people on Briskoda have claimed all sorts of benefits from the PD160 one including increased power, more responsiveness and greater sexual attractiveness - but with no hard data.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
oldbeaver (01-26-2011)
Old 01-26-2011, 06:21 AM   #6 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,750

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,331
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Nice article Waiting for more to see what I can try on my HDi.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2011, 04:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Did you look at the PD 160 intake as this can be a direct drop-in replacement and it has much less of a change in diameter from the intake panel to the pipe.
Yes looked a this. Very expensive locally.

Without giving away too much, I can say that the new intake flows very well and the impact on car performance was interesting!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 06:53 AM   #8 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian Edgar View Post
Yes looked a this. Very expensive locally.

Without giving away too much, I can say that the new intake flows very well and the impact on car performance was interesting!
Looking forward to seeing that one then. The intake is spendy, over £90 here including VAT. It was under 50 until SEAT dealers realised they could make extra money.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2011, 04:28 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
New intake cost very little - maybe AUD$30
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 01:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Julian,

Very strange results from your latest installment. It goes contrary to everything I have ever read and experienced with a diesel. Numerous papers and test stand experiments show that a diesel with a leaner mixture ( more air and using the same amount of fuel ) produces more power.

With the lower pressure drop on the intake there will be a higher pressure in the rest of the intake. This would reduce the amount of EGR that can be used. I'm betting that the emissions computer is restricting fuel to limit NOx.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com