Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Did you pick up any new tips from the list?
Yes 268 92.41%
No 22 7.59%
Voters: 290. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-08-2013, 12:54 PM   #421 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
What?

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-08-2013, 03:13 PM   #422 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 53.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,246 Times in 1,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtgh View Post
gas is cheap.
its inflated the same price a bread from 1970 to present.
about 10x, like most things.
don't worry, be happy
Why do you visit this forum?
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2013, 03:27 PM   #423 (permalink)
.
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
Changed my mind again. The outside curve preserves more momentum then the inside "racing line."
__________________
I try to be helpful. I'm not an expert.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-2013, 10:13 PM   #424 (permalink)
radioranger
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canton CT
Posts: 442
Thanks: 140
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts
The ultra gauge has been great, found out I make better MPG going 62 than 58 , go figure, averaging 41 mpg now mostly highway but highly up and down for about 30 miles per trip seem to get around 44 on th ehighway but hills kill me .
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2013, 01:22 AM   #425 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog 44 View Post
Changed my mind again. The outside curve preserves more momentum then the inside "racing line."
The inside isnt' the 'racing line', it's just the inside of the curve.

If you want to preserve the most momentum, you take the shortest distance through the curve, not the shortest arc.

This involves turning the curve into a wider arc than it actually is. Typically for a simple right curve, you start on the yellow line, turn in toward the white line, and then move back out toward the white line. It's as straight as you can go through a curve.

Complex curves get a little more... complicated.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-2013, 04:55 PM   #426 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Minimising the sideways scrubbing of the tyres when going through a curve is the key - and that's what the racing line does.
The effect of cornering on instant FC is quite noticeable.
Not having to accelerate again is also a bonus.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 12:34 PM   #427 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: AL
Posts: 29

Blueberry Yaris - '09 Toyota Yaris Base 2-door Hatchback 1.5L Automatic
90 day: 31.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 11
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Additional tip for Route selection or Sub/urban section:

Combining errands: favor right turns over left turns at stop light intersections

In general, right turns are more fuel efficient than left turns. When combining multiple trips into one journey, choose the order of destinations that will result in the least amount of left turns.

^ This may somewhat conflict with going to the farthest destination first. This could be a test somebody could perform. Farthest destination fuel economy vs. right turn fuel economy. Do it on a stretch of road where the farthest destination is on the left side of the road and the other destination is on the right side from the beginning point. Might have to do it on hot and cool days as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2014, 07:35 PM   #428 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2

famfegnugen - '02 Volkswagon Passat Wagen B5.5

Geo Metro - '91 Geo Metro 3 door hatchback, base model
90 day: 53.9 mpg (US)

15 Passanger Van - '08 Chevy Safari Van
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Great list. I would love to add a few of my own:

1) Choose the hilliest route option. It seems counter intuitive, but I get much better mileage when I travel over big bridges and hills. During my daily commute I go slightly out of my way to get to the top of a big hill so I can roll several miles down hill EOC. Even major mountain passes help my mpg a bunch. It's the ultimate pulse/glide. Driving farther to get a higher mpg doesn't always save gas, but sometimes it does in a big way.

2) Accelerate quickly to keep your engine in the efficiency sweet spot. Also allows for a longer glide before the next pulse.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2014, 04:36 PM   #429 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
topcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: England
Posts: 37

Celica VVTI - '05 Toyota Celica GT VVTI
Team Toyota
90 day: 41.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by go_slow-save_dough View Post
Great list. I would love to add a few of my own:

1) Choose the hilliest route option. It seems counter intuitive, but I get much better mileage when I travel over big bridges and hills. During my daily commute I go slightly out of my way to get to the top of a big hill so I can roll several miles down hill EOC. Even major mountain passes help my mpg a bunch. It's the ultimate pulse/glide. Driving farther to get a higher mpg doesn't always save gas, but sometimes it does in a big way.
How odd. I find quite the opposite. I just came here to recommend taking the flattest route, particularly routes which follow rivers. Apart from anything else, hilly routes are longer by 1/cos(theta).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2014, 05:04 PM   #430 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by topcat View Post
How odd. I find quite the opposite. I just came here to recommend taking the flattest route, particularly routes which follow rivers.
Pulse & glide upsets the whole traditional thinking about fuel saving

Downhill, the glides can be very long if the grades are good - not too steep so you don't overspeed, not too shallow so you can keep up a good speed.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com