03-19-2010, 10:55 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
2011 Mustang V6 305 hp and 31mpg
LA Preview: 2011 Ford Mustang V6 makes 305 HP, gets 30 MPG — Autoblog
some interesting comments on how they did it........basic ecomodding actually.
"That impressive fuel economy figure isn't just the result of the new engine – a suite of new pieces have been developed in order to maximize performance, including a revised air intake, a pair of new six-speed transmissions (both automatic and manual), electric power steering, and even some aerodynamic tidying, including a revised front fascia, deeper front air dam, rear-wheel tire spats, different underbody shields, and a new rear decklid seal."
say it ain't so Joe!
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
03-19-2010, 11:12 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...begs the question: "...WHY didn't they do this YEARS ago?"
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-19-2010, 11:39 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
HOLY ****! Decreasing aerodynamic drag lowers fuel consumption? NO WAY!
...After looking at all the specs also that's really not impressive at all.
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 02:01 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Lancaster Ca
Posts: 362
Tank - '76 Chevy El Camino Classic 90 day: 25.89 mpg (US) Sabrina - '91 Mercedes Benz 190 E 90 day: 37.07 mpg (US) Angel - '88 Mercedes-Benz 420SEL Last 3: 23.01 mpg (US) Quicksilver - '04 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG Cabrio
Thanks: 52
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Not that impressice because Ford Had those plans for as long as Chevy did with the 304 HP V6 Camaro which looks waaay less aerodynamic but gets 29 MPG also
__________________
Tank:
(No actual EPA numbers for car just used F/E numbers when i first got it)
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 02:33 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Domman56
Not that impressice because Ford Had those plans for as long as Chevy did with the 304 HP V6 Camaro which looks waaay less aerodynamic but gets 29 MPG also
|
When dealing with aero, there is a big difference between "looks" and "is".
Technically, a brick is more aerodynamic than the GM SunRaycer. Why? It's got approx 1/100th the frontal area, regardless that the Cd is something like 20x higher.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 02:35 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
They should just give the new Mustang the EcoBoost V6, and to hell with "traditional power".
Seriously, it's about time they stopped sacrificing the rest of the product line to keep the Mustang as their "exotic" offering. Either step up and build up the line, or step aside and let someone else into the ring.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 02:46 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
|
Actually, they should repeat history.
The 64-66 mustang offered a 200ci straight 6 w/ a 2.89 rear end and no a/c.
13 inch rims I think. a real FE model.
At the top the had the 289 4bl with a 4.10 rear end and a 4 speed.
They could, IMHO, really stake a claim with a eco model. Look how lexus has a hybrd on the IS model...and that is their boy racer model.
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 02:59 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
mcrews -
I looked at the pix, but mostly saw engine stuff. I wanna see a belly shot.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
|
|
03-20-2010, 12:58 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Driving the TurboWeasel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
31 MPG from a 305 hp pony car is nothing to sneeze at. I bet we could see 40 MPG easily with the manual transmission version. I bet when Chevy ups the Camaro's mileage they come out with a 33 MPG version.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
|
|
|
|
|
03-21-2010, 02:27 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Call me when they give an independent rear suspension and it loses 500 lb.
|
|
|
|
|
