Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2015, 07:29 PM   #51 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
A truck is therefore a business proposition. One must know annual fuel cost, dollars and gallons versus miles. Absolute mpg numbers aren't as important as keeping average mph high versus engine hours. It's a different strategy, and dictates different tactics.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (08-19-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-19-2015, 02:44 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyking View Post
Not for the OP's 90% freeway driving. Like I said before, you can't effectively P & G at freeway speed, and for sure not in a comparative drag bucket.
I think you need to reread my post, specifically where I stated "the 18% better final drive would outweigh the advantages of the manual."
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aardvarcus For This Useful Post:
skyking (08-19-2015)
Old 08-19-2015, 02:55 PM   #53 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
skyking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 1,399

Woody - '96 Dodge Ram 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 23.82 mpg (US)

Avion and Woody - '96 Dodge/Avion Ram 2500/5th wheel combo
90 day: 15.1 mpg (US)

TD eye eye eye - '03 Volkswagen Beetle GLS
90 day: 49.05 mpg (US)

Mule - '07 Dodge Ram 3500 ST
Thanks: 743
Thanked 528 Times in 344 Posts
Yes I jumped to the tail end, sorry.
My "new" truck is a good example. It has a higher final drive ratio, but the reliability alone of the auto is not working for me. I was happy to find a 6 speed manual.
I've had the transmission in the truck in my sig out twice. It is painful.
__________________




2007 Dodge Ram 3500 SRW 4x4 with 6MT
2003 TDI Beetle
2002 TDI Beetle

currently parked - 1996 Dodge 2500 Cummins Turbodiesel
Custom cab, auto, 3.55 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2015, 05:50 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
implying

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asanelli View Post
So you implying the manual is the way to go??
I'm uncertain that we have any known quantities at all to work with.We have no idea what your BSFC is doing one way or the other.
Hucho is going to tell you to streamline the hell out of the truck,and do whatever you can for rolling resistance,and only then,when you're finished modifying,figure out your gear-matching from there to optimize the road load reduction.
If you initially do the gearing,you may shoot yourself in the foot if you modify the truck later.
Gearing is at the end of the efficiency equation,not the beginning.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 08:54 AM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
Once you got the truck streamlined and your rolling resistance down, one solution to the 4.0L V6’s less than ideal manual transmission overdrive gear ratio of 0.85 is the URD Tacoma T56 Transmission Swap Kit. The URD T56 Swap kit is designed to use a T56 transmission that was originally used in the 1998-2002 Chevrolet Camaro.

T-56
1st=2.66:1
2nd=1.78:1
3rd=1.30:1
4th=1.00:1
5th=0.74:1
6th=0.50:1
R=2.90:1

Going from 0.85 OD to 0.5 OD is a 41% reduction in RPM! To maintain 4x4 you could either run a specialty T56 transmission setup for a bolt on transfer case, or run a divorce mounted transfer case (i.e. Divorced Atlas II).

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com