Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-05-2020, 07:53 PM   #21 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Aeromods in heavy traffic?

Seriously, if you have to stay in the high 70s to keep from becoming a statistic, the surrounding traffic is your aeromod. You've got the corridor effect going on: cars in front, behind and all around. Not that it's a cure-all. I've found (in my car, on my roads, YMMV) that drafting a good 18 wheeler is good for 10 mph. That's best case- drafting behind a big rig at steady speed, I get the same mileage as I would hypermiling in open air at 10 mph less. So behind a truck at 70, I'm getting what I'd see on my own at 60.

Except your corridor isn't made by professional drivers at steady speeds, it's made by psychopaths that make it unsafe to drive more slowly. So you're not going to get optimal results from that corridor. But in traffic that heavy, I think aeromods are a waste of time.

__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Hersbird (04-06-2020)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-05-2020, 09:00 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
Quote:
I've found (in my car, on my roads, YMMV) that drafting a good 18 wheeler is good for 10 mph. That's best case- drafting behind a big rig at steady speed....
Back when I could go out on the Interstate (), I found the best result with a full-widith half-height load on a flatbed. Less buffeting than with a full-height box van.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Fat Charlie (04-05-2020)
Old 05-14-2020, 06:56 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Update, I did digging, worked out some visuals. I installed a few vortex generators around the center behind the antenna in the back plastic piece with a separation of about 11 inches at the farthest points. Gave them about 20 degrees angle. Doesn't really change the fuel mileage much if at all, but certainly seems to increase the wind envelope stability when passing trucks, etc. I didn't have a ton of cross wind today. But I'm hoping to see how well it does in the nasty crosswinds we have been getting as of late.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gregersonke For This Useful Post:
freebeard (05-14-2020)
Old 05-15-2020, 05:47 AM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
GreenTDI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Belgium
Posts: 228

GreenTDI - '11 Skoda Fabia Estate R3 1.2 CRTDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 65.02 mpg (US)
Thanks: 54
Thanked 93 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie View Post
So behind a truck at 70, I'm getting what I'd see on my own at 60.
.
18 wheelers going 70 mph? That even sounds dangerous. On the other hand, driving behind such a monster at that speed is some serious hypermiling! In Europe they're all limited at 55 mph.
__________________
Skoda Fabia Estate R3 1.2 CRTDI
See my thread: https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...mpg-38318.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2020, 11:33 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,745

Volt, gas only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 38.02 mpg (US)

Volt, electric only - '12 Chevrolet Volt Premium
90 day: 132.26 mpg (US)

Yukon Denali Hybrid - '12 GMC Yukon Denali Hybrid
90 day: 21.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 206
Thanked 420 Times in 302 Posts
As mentioned in other posts, not much to be gained from increasing mileage from that point. If gas is $4/gal and you make the MASSIVE change from 45mpg to 60mpg, over a 180 mile trip you'll save $4.

The question becomes: at what effort/cost?
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2020, 11:42 AM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 52.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTDI View Post
18 wheelers going 70 mph? That even sounds dangerous. On the other hand, driving behind such a monster at that speed is some serious hypermiling! In Europe they're all limited at 55 mph.
70 mph? Going down a mountain on a straight highway you better keep an eye on your mirrors no matter what speed you're going. The semis use gravity to get to extreme speeds. Something you have to be aware of if you rent a car in the States as an European. Some I've seen fly by must have hit 100 mph or more.
Also, if you are on an incline near the crest of a mountain and there's a semi climbing slowly up ahead, better not pass but stay behind it.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2020, 11:50 AM   #27 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,742

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,469 Times in 3,434 Posts
Once when I was 15, I was driving the family van north on i-5 coming down the Grapevine at 80 MPH, and was passed on the right like I was standing still by an 18 wheeler.

Generally the speed limit for tractor/trailers is 55 MPH and they do 60. On roads where the limit for everyone is 75 or 80, I see the truckers going 70 or more.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2020, 12:48 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Once when I was 15, I was driving the family van north on i-5 coming down the Grapevine at 80 MPH, and was passed on the right like I was standing still by an 18 wheeler.

Generally the speed limit for tractor/trailers is 55 MPH and they do 60. On roads where the limit for everyone is 75 or 80, I see the truckers going 70 or more.
The grapevine is a dangerous place for truckers. The one that passed you may have very well lost his brakes or other serious issue.

As for where trucks tend to speed, it's kind of the same as we cars. Where it's plain and simple safer for them to do so they will. Where it's not, they won't. Truck drivers in general are significantly safer drivers than car drivers. It's not 100 percent, but statistically, they are a lot safer per mile than car drivers. The big thing with car drivers, they need to be aware of what trucks will need to do in a turn etc. Aka, if you are on a wide freeway exit, don't pass them on the right. Wait...
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2020, 01:07 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Jose
Posts: 15
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Okay, my vortex generators were apparently more effective than I thought they would be. Consistently, I just recorded two back to back record fuel mileage days doing the same 80mph speeds on the same route. Even going directly into the wind I'm getting well into the 40s where before I'd be in the 30's. Going with the wind is better too, the window in the back seems to stay a bit cleaner too. I think I'm going to make something like the toyota prius TRD roof garnish, but a bit smaller as it's become apparent that I can use the small window bubble down effectively to achieve the result I want.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com