Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-02-2012, 01:46 PM   #1 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
300-6 cam HELP

I have been thinking of swapping cams in the ford when I overhaul it.
My idea is to keep as much mileage as I can but get some more low end grunt and a few more ponies. I have been looking at a couple of cams, but if you have ANY input please feel free to throw it in.

The first is a COMP 252.
The second is a COMP 260.

This truck hardly ever sees more than 3,000 rpm. It gets loaded heavy and can weigh 14,000 lbs without a trailer. It would be nice to have a little more pulling power when taking off uphill, which seems to happen more often than not. 1-3rd are ok, but 4th is sluggy.

__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-02-2012, 02:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 109
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
My vote would be for the stock cam, more compression with decking the block and a very efficient exhaust. Stock compression is only 8.8/1. 9.2 to 1 would work well with regular fuel or mid grade. Optimize the ignition timing as well. Almost all cams will move the powerband up which won't improve your efficiency.

Last edited by hondaguy72; 08-02-2012 at 02:21 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2012, 02:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
tortoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 71

number 9 - '89 Geo Metro LSi
90 day: 49.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Look at Isky's 331-M Mile-A-Mor. Optimized for 1000-3800 RPM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 12:04 AM   #4 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,187

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Keep the factory cam and retard it one gear tooth.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 12:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
If anything, I would want to advance the timing right? I suppose I have to be the tester on this one. It wouldn't take much to change the timing and see how it works. I have been told that advancing the timing one tooth will give a boost in power AND mileage. This came from a guy who has been messing with timing for 25 years. Race cams are retarded to give more high end to the motor. I want torque, so I would advance the cam to bring whatever top end it has, down.

I think I need new valve springs, because they sound like they are floating above 3500. It sounds all garbly and rough. The motor on my sawmill did that too, until I stretched out the springs.....
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 07:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Find the cam with the most aggressive pattern that your engine can use (ie a roller cam is best) Lift is good, duration is bad. Change to a higher rocker ratio while there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 08:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 72
Thanks: 6
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Stock cam retarted 5 deg.-10deg. will keep the exhaust valve closed longer during the power stroke gaining additional usefull work at part throttle. Delayed intake closing reduces pumping losses slightly and cuts back precombustion pressure allowing the use of a higher CR for a given fuel octane.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 09:29 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Retarding the cam will decrease the dynamic compression ratio, this would be good if you had a higher CR, but I doubt this engine does. I am not sure that that is the way to go?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2012, 09:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
Here is what the engine sounds like. The knocking sounds like it is coming from the block. A stethescope does not tell me much.

This is why I want to do a rebuild on the motor.
It is not bad, but I want to get it taken care of ASAP. I think it is either rod bearings or lifters.

idle noise - YouTube
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2012, 01:16 AM   #10 (permalink)
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 109
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Rod bearings is probably right. Hard to tell in the video.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com