Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-20-2012, 01:05 PM   #11 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Indiana, US
Posts: 133

TheCav - '04 Chevy Cavalier LS
Thanks: 13
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Interesting. Does this mean If I run premium i will get more mpg?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-20-2012, 01:23 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
POSSIBLY.

it really depends on how your PCM reacts to it. i know with GM OBD2 stuff, there are multiple main spark tables, which one is used depends upon how much knock is detected.

try it for a tank or two.... the difference between 15 gallons of regular and 15 gallons of premium is $3....
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 03:22 PM   #13 (permalink)
Adventurist!
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 144

CLaero - '97 Acura CL Premium
90 day: 34.59 mpg (US)

CR-v - '03 Honda CR-V EX
Team Honda
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 21 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertISaar View Post
because you've changed the conditions.

with a grille block in place, the engine is under less load since there is less aerodynamic drag to fight against. an engine at the same RPM, but with lower load can GENERALLY get away with running more advance without running into knock.
I agree with the changing conditions and aero load being slightly lower, but the bigger factor, at least in my Acura, seems to be the warmer intake air allowing a higher degree of timing advance.
__________________
'97 Acura CL 2.2L 5spd
'03 Honda CR-V 2.4L EX 4wd Auto
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 06:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ever_green's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 264

gueff - '19 Mercedes Benz A250 4MATIC AMG
90 day: 30.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 79 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nbleak21 View Post
I agree with the changing conditions and aero load being slightly lower, but the bigger factor, at least in my Acura, seems to be the warmer intake air allowing a higher degree of timing advance.
i have noticed that on warmer days ignition timing is higher. i had no clue higher temps means higher ignition timing.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2012, 08:21 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
warmer air is less dense air. less dense air-charge means lower load.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2012, 09:42 PM   #16 (permalink)
halos.com
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 528

ECONORAM - '07 Dodge RAM 1500 QC SLT flex-fuel
90 day: 18.16 mpg (US)

the Avenger - '08 Dodge Avenger SXT
90 day: 27.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 385
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to ECONORAM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertISaar View Post
POSSIBLY.

it really depends on how your PCM reacts to it. i know with GM OBD2 stuff, there are multiple main spark tables, which one is used depends upon how much knock is detected.

try it for a tank or two.... the difference between 15 gallons of regular and 15 gallons of premium is $3....
Very true. My Jettas gained because the original timing was conservative. My 07 RAM gains 1.5mpg with premium, but ONLY when I run a 91 octane tune with my Superchips tuner. On the factory tune, changing octane has no effect.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com