Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-03-2008, 01:21 AM   #11 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,755

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,582
Thanked 3,540 Times in 2,211 Posts
trik you are full of it. I have a '59 and it does no such thing.

__________________


  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-03-2008, 10:03 AM   #12 (permalink)
Legend in my own mind
 
trikkonceptz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927

Evil Pumpkin - '08 Scion xD RS 1.0 #1633
90 day: 35.45 mpg (US)

Silent Silver Killer - '10 Honda Insight EX
90 day: 51.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
trik you are full of it. I have a '59 and it does no such thing.

No ... it did happen, and on more than one ocassion, in fact my friends use to love to ride in it just to experience the efffect. Now, this wasn't traveling @ hwy speeds as with the 348 I was always drag racing mustangs, but it was a real effect none the less. And yes the 1960 saw a dramatic cut back in the design of the rear tail.
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"

I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???





  Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008, 03:39 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 808 Times in 592 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by trikkonceptz View Post
And yes the 1960 saw a dramatic cut back in the design of the rear tail.
Not that dramatic, IMHO. Just a more angular shape, and different tail lights.

1959: 1959 Classic Chevrolet - The New Slimline Design!

1960: 1960 Chevy.com

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video: tuft testing (rear) 1993 Ford Mustang notchback MetroMPG Aerodynamics 12 02-05-2011 09:40 AM
Ford Focus aerodynamics question Formula413 Aerodynamics 20 05-11-2009 06:34 PM
Ford, making money? It must be a mistake... SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 3 04-28-2008 09:28 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com