Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-27-2010, 04:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Estonia
Posts: 11

Renoo - '96 Renault Laguna RT
90 day: 39.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
about compression ratio

Searched forum but got no good answer....
I have right now 1.8l 66kw 4cyl engine with compression 9.8:1
if I raise it to 10.5:1 then what about fuel consumptiom?
more economic or less?
I drive usually with octane 98 or sometimes 95.
I have no manual, but I guess manufacturer(renault) suggests 95 (or 91 if 95 is not available)
My typical trip: 85% country roads(+highway) and 15% city

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-27-2010, 06:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
If you raise the compression of an engine, you will increase efficiency (all other things being equal). However, altering compression always affects other things, and you should mainly be concerned with ignition advance. If the increased compression causes pinging, the ignition timing will be retarded and you will loose any gain you might have gotten. Running higher octane fuel will help this. Its really a balancing act and until you know your engine and do testing nobody can say how far you can go. It also all depends on the environment you drive in, humidity, altitude, temperature. All those things effect ignition timing. So, what might work well one day won't the next. Thankfully, the OEMs have the resources to test for this and build in some safety factor for us.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2010, 06:42 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Estonia
Posts: 11

Renoo - '96 Renault Laguna RT
90 day: 39.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
So... I know that engine is more efficient, but how about fuel consumption?
66kw car burns 7l/100km(90km/h) or 100kw car burns 7l/100km(90km/h)

- both are wasting same amount fuel....
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2010, 11:19 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by atsik View Post
So... I know that engine is more efficient, but how about fuel consumption?
66kw car burns 7l/100km(90km/h) or 100kw car burns 7l/100km(90km/h)

- both are wasting same amount fuel....
fuel consumption should go down as you will only need to use less throttle for same power as older engine . That's as long as fuel octane is good enough for the raised CR as the above poster said .

Now does your engine (any version) come with 10.5 , How are you raising it, by thinner head gasket, different pistons, different head .

You might have to alter the ignition timing curve but from 9.8 to 10.5 is only 0.7 of a CR, and I think you be fine but you need to test for any pinging or pull back in timing if you have knock sensor .
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2010, 12:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
If you increase the compression by changing the stroke it will use more fuel since it will be a larger engine pulling more air in. Increasing the compression by shaving the heads, using thinner head/ lower end gaskets, or pistons would be the best way to do it.

As said before it should reduce fuel consumption if it does not significantly drop timing. With that said it could allow the use of larger gears or reduce the need of down-shifting when going uphill, and allow it to up-shift earlier with out lugging the engine.

Do your research on increasing the compression with your motor to see what issues you could run into. I assume that the engine has an over head cam so valve train geometry should not be a problem if shaving the heads or using thinner gaskets but could have valve to piston clearance issues.

What engine are you running?
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2010, 03:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Estonia
Posts: 11

Renoo - '96 Renault Laguna RT
90 day: 39.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I thought about head shaving, its relatively cheap here-only 40-50$ + new casket.
and because i use RON 98 anyway then timing is not a big prob, i guess.
engine is 1.8l 8v k56 (renault) with 90hp(66kw).

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Met an unhappy Aveo owner today MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 24 10-10-2010 07:03 AM
[Article] Better Fuel Economy with Ethanol? SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 62 04-02-2010 11:31 AM
Electronic Engine Control Algorithm. Is this Correct? worstmechanic EcoModding Central 7 01-08-2010 06:18 PM
Where did the hot-air intake idea originate? delslo The Lounge 26 08-10-2009 11:01 PM
Honda Working on Variable Compression Ratio Engines SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 2 04-25-2009 06:58 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com