Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-01-2012, 01:38 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
I saw a quote on the wall this last weekend at the Auto Museum:

"Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines" Enzo Ferrari

I'm pretty sure these designs are unbuilt, although the Bugatti one is presumed to have the W16 out of the Veyron.

High speeds would bring out the flaws in these styling exercises. I think they're interesting for the different ways they handle underbody airflow.

There was a thread on the underbody that the mods spun this one out of.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-01-2012, 10:13 AM   #12 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telco View Post
Not a fan of any of the designs, but as to whether it's functional or stylistic aero, what's the car's top speed? The faster the car's top speed, the more functional the aero must be.
As much as aero matters, power matters for top speed. Aero can be amazing and have little power, or there can be crazy power with no regard to aero. So it depends if they put a W in it or a 3 cylinder.
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 04:47 PM   #13 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
I saw a quote on the wall this last weekend at the Auto Museum:

"Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines" Enzo Ferrari
Didn't he also say something along the lines of the chassis was just there to support the engine ?

Just around the time Cooper, Vanwall and Lotus overtook his cars with fire pump engines ?
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2012, 06:35 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
Did you know about this:
JCB Dieselmax – powering the World's Fastest Diesel Vehicle

Here's another quote from the Museum:
"If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough" Mario Andretti
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 01:07 AM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, yes and no. If the aero is wrong, the engine can make the car fly. I beleive someone here posted this pic in another post?

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 01:22 AM   #16 (permalink)
Hydrogen > EV
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: NW Ohio, United States
Posts: 2,025

Silver Flea - '05 Honda Insight
90 day: 58.96 mpg (US)
Thanks: 994
Thanked 402 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telco View Post
Well, yes and no. If the aero is wrong, the engine can make the car fly. I beleive someone here posted this pic in another post?

This should only happen if one lets more lift occur than downforce, to my knowledge. And it is not yes and no. It does not matter how bad the aero is, if one can add power, it can go faster. It may not be efficient or useful, but it can. Aero has a terminal point. Power does, but it is much easier to find the aero limit than power. Fron NA, to direct injection, turbo, super, dual air induction, different fuels, electric power, so on. How low can we make drag? At least, while staying on the ground, in our atmosphere.

I am not saying aero does not matter in the essence of automotives.

You asked what their top speed is, on these non production cars without engines. Well, their top speed depends on their engine. If one put a w12 or 16 quad turbo into an F150, I reckon it would have a higher top speed than these concepts with 300 hp in them.

Yes, aero matters. But aero x power = top speed
__________________





Best Tanks:
Mustang - 54.83 mpg (US) at the Green Grand Prix
Insight - 82.91966 mpg (US) over 818.5 miles.

Last edited by UltArc; 10-02-2012 at 01:28 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2012, 10:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
This should only happen if one lets more lift occur than downforce, to my knowledge. And it is not yes and no. It does not matter how bad the aero is, if one can add power, it can go faster. It may not be efficient or useful, but it can. Aero has a terminal point. Power does, but it is much easier to find the aero limit than power. Fron NA, to direct injection, turbo, super, dual air induction, different fuels, electric power, so on. How low can we make drag? At least, while staying on the ground, in our atmosphere.

I am not saying aero does not matter in the essence of automotives.

You asked what their top speed is, on these non production cars without engines. Well, their top speed depends on their engine. If one put a w12 or 16 quad turbo into an F150, I reckon it would have a higher top speed than these concepts with 300 hp in them.

Yes, aero matters. But aero x power = top speed
Excellent, then we are in agreement.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 01:55 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
I guarantee you neither of those "concepts" exist. I also guarantee you Bugatti had nothing to do with that "Bugatti concept".

Looks like an aero mess.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 04:32 PM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
^Agreed.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2012, 04:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Every car designer (or car doodler like me) has a Bugatti Type 57 Atlantic rendering somewhere. The original one still looks the best TBH.

As for Aero, its more in the looks than the reality, and the chassis was just there to support the body as it took its owner and his mistress to dinner at a sedate 40-50 MPH - For example this rather fierce looking "Lorry" could outrun it.


__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com