Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now

Reply  Post New Thread
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2008, 03:30 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
aerohead's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,814
Thanks: 23,882
Thanked 7,185 Times in 4,625 Posts
aero mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment # 7-Wheels/Tires/Wheelcovers/etc.

Note from Darin (admin): this installment is part of a series posted by Phil (aerohead) about the effectiveness of various aero mods - usually with quotations and citations to source data.

See the Aero mods data index here.

End note.


I've left out the new pre-tire airdams,as I believe they have been addressed by other members and I don't have any additional info on them.

First,a general note. An ideal body form,say,with a Cd of 0.04, when brought into ground-effect,will see it's drag coefficient degrade to Cd 0.09. The addition of wheels and tires further degrades the drag coefficient to 0.14 ( from VW and Fiat research ). Presently, Cds for a "real" vehicle,in ground-effect,have touched 0.10, as with the HONDA Dream II solar-car.And you may argue as to whether or not the HONDA typifies a real car or not.The example is to illustrate the extremes one must go to,to achieve those kinds of numbers.

So from my rat's nest, I've collected some tidbits chronicling observations or reports of those attempting to deal with the rubber donut beasties over the decades,here we go:

1938, front wheel skirts are added to the Adler-Jaray and a 2.6 % drag reduction is measured.

1954, from wind tunnel research on the GM Firebird I "Dream Car",by enclosing the exposed wheels within fenders,the drag is cut from Cd 0.335,to Cd 0.311 (7.7 % ).

1958, Mercedes-Benz encloses the wheels of it's 2.5-liter Gran Prix Racing car with full body work,and despite larger overall sectional area,drag is reduced 20 % and top speed increased 11 % ( JEEP and HUMMER owners,this applies to you!).

1961, Deutsch / Romani,Panhard C.D. achieves Cd 0.15 ( over D.B.Coupe's Cd 0.18 ),by using fairings behind the wheels.The car hits 127-mph with 60 Bhp.

June 1962, HOT ROD Magazine credits either front or rear wheel skirts with a Cd reduction of approximately 0.02.

1963, Walter Korff ( Lockheed Aircraft ) claims "A smooth,slightly crowned disc out to the sidewall ( MOON EQUIPMENT CO. ),on each side of the wheel, provides a big improvement. Covering the wheels and suspension with an envelope type body is better; smoothly streamlining the envelope is best by far."

1963, Korff estimates open-wheeled Gran Prix car (remember Mercedes?) at Cd 0.75 and 7square- feet frontal area,and CdA of 5.25 square -feet.( this implies that the Mercedes race car,by enclosing the wheels achieved CdA 4.2 square-feet (something also to think about as regards to the 1987 Oldsmobile AEROTECH Land Speed Record Car built on March Indycar chassis).

1963, Korff allows for a 7.6 % drag reduction with use of front wheel skirts in his recipe for a Cd 0.21 car.

1969, R.G.S.White makes no mention of undercar modifications except for the bellypan in his recipe for a Cd 0.24 automoblie.

1982,Pontiac Trans Am Firebird wind-tunnel studies show Larry Shinoda's trick aero wheel-covers trim 0.027 off drag coefficient,compared to a open wheel.

1986, wind tunnel development work for Subaru XT show a drag increase of 5.1 % when tire size is increased from 155 to 185 series radials.Drag is reduced 2.0 % due to "air flaps" steering air over rear tires.Completely flat/sealed wheel-covers show a 2.75 % drag reduction.

1984-1987 HONDA CRX shows jump from 165 to 185 series radials increase drag 9.3 %.

General Note: Korff published drag for opened-wheeled go-kart and motorcycle at Cd0.90.Hoerner also reports open motorcycle at Cd 0.90.Easy Rider's Harley-Davidson streamliner motorcycle and Kenny Lion's #919 BMW-powered streamliner bike (same body as Easy Rider's ) score Cd 0.11 in Texas Tech Aero- Lab wind-tunnel,1991,a bit better than Burt Munro's Indian's open cockpit bike record-holder,1967.

Final thought,the HONDA Dream II at Cd 0.10 utilizes lazy-Susan turntables for the steering wheels.Only the lowest part of the tires are exposed to the air stream and in between suspension travel,the front wheel/suspension members have no discernable "opening". Clever!

Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
aardvarcus (07-17-2013), ausias (05-24-2013), blueprintbill (03-21-2011), dremd (09-23-2009), Gtaw (05-16-2011), hendan (06-22-2010), jime57 (04-08-2010), landsailor (06-02-2011), meekin (06-29-2010), mikeyjd (06-04-2014), sidecar (10-26-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

Old 02-28-2010, 09:23 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 9

civic - '95 Honda Civic DX 3 door hatchback
90 day: 49.27 mpg (US)

SV - '03 Suzuki SV650 S
90 day: 52.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Great thread. I am very interested in streamlining cars. I hope we can all work together and share ideas and make some significant aerodynamic improvements.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lilcivic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (03-06-2010)
Old 06-22-2010, 01:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: EASTERN Oregon
Posts: 16
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wow. Great information!
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2011, 08:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: michigan
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is pretty neat. I would have never guessed that wind drag could be reduced so dramatically by simply enclosing the wheels. I wonder why we don't see more of this out on the road. Judging by these numbers, this is something that can make a dramatic impact on a global scale if implemented on all vehicles.
off delay timer

Last edited by naturefreak; 06-06-2011 at 01:42 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 08:45 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 65
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 13 Posts
One of the major sources of wheel drag appears to be caused by jetting vortices exiting out and up from the tire/road intersection. This was first mentionioned by Morelli (he of the Aptera bodyshape) citing Cogotti, whowas able to achieve a power reduction of 5kW for and expenditure of 240W by adding in-wheel turbines to the rear wheels, and directing the flow to counter the vortices (SAE 2001-01-0491 it'll cost ya)
More recently Tamas has produced a flurry of papers, all of which are freely available as PDFs online. Here's a couple.



The first one seems to show some promising techniques for simple add-ons, in other words, Ecomods.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to autogyro For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-04-2014)
Old 06-04-2014, 01:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
mikeyjd's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford Fusion aero mods: Cd from 0.34 to 0.21 MetroMPG Aerodynamics 35 08-13-2011 02:39 PM
mods-data-% change or Cd change( installment#5-roofline data) aerohead Aerodynamics 3 09-26-2009 03:01 PM
aero mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment #6-underside/bellypans ) aerohead Aerodynamics 1 05-30-2008 11:45 PM

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com