Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-20-2012, 09:31 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,710
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,927 Times in 7,370 Posts
Aerodynamic tailpipe tip?

Decades ago in Popular Mechanics or Mechanix Illustrated, I saw a design for an aerodynamically efficient exhaust tip. Since I have no hope of finding the article (which I may still have) I took the opportunity to model it in Wings 3D:


The theory was that the cross sectional area at the middle of the cone is equal to the cross section of the tailpipe. Considering one of Julian Edgar's articles at Ballistic Bellmouths and the Supertrapp muffler, is there something worth pursuing here?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-20-2012, 11:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I built something very similar to that once. On my version I was hoping to get sound dampening by making the cone of perforated metal sheet stuffed with packing- rock wool, stainless, etc. It did work- I thought it sounded good- but the packing got all blown out way too quickly and of course it got real loud too. I planned on keeping the housing but making a conical sheet metal shield for the perforated cone with the idea that the shield would take the direct blast of heat and pressure while the packed cone would still muffle with absolutely minimal back pressure. Never did that phase II.

Anyway, my impressions of it are all subjective as I didn't put it on the flowbench or test it with the sound meters. Additionally I didn't do any stopwatch/dyno testing to see if there was a power difference although subjectively I'd have to say the fart can with cone baffle didn't seem to make any difference vs. the stock muffler.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 12:13 AM   #3 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
There was a LOT of British interest in those devices back in the 1950's-1960's. For example, read about them in Smith's book (pp. 133-136):

Philip H. Smith & John C. Morrison, Scientific Design of Exhaust and Intake Systems, 2nd Ed (1970), Robert Bentley Publication.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 04:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,710
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,927 Times in 7,370 Posts
Quote:
Scientific Design of Exhaust and Intake Systems
I don't have that one sitting on my bookshelf. The only technical book I have on the subject is Physics of Ground Vehicles.

Care to summarize?

The closest I might get to something like this would be to replace the VW's pea-shooter tails pipes with two small Supertrapp mufflers. They're tuneable, maybe the cone-shaped plug in the reference design could be made tuneable as well.

Frank Lee -- maybe the spindle shape could be made by stacking up washers of increasing and then decreasing size, with spacers in between each one. It would be kind of like the silencer on a pistol turned inside out.

I wasn't thinking so much about silencing as decreasing back pressure by coupling the exhaust flow to the ambient air as efficiently as possible. Belled ends on trumpets and other horns would be another example.


Here's a muffler (a mute) for a cornet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 08:04 PM   #5 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
What your talking about is a coanda nozzle.

here is some information on testing of it. It doesn't really help all too much unless you play with the exhaust valve opening time.

http://cafefoundation.org/v2/pdf_caf...0PART%20IV.pdf
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2012, 09:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,710
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,927 Times in 7,370 Posts
It sounds interesting —— but the link gets redirected to 403 Forbidden. So I thought I wouldn't get frustrated and did a search of Google of "inurl:EPG PART IV.pdf" and found it available at findthatpdf.com and ebookbrowse.com. They all get 403 Forbidden.

Quote:
It doesn't really help all too much unless you play with the exhaust valve opening time.
That sounds like what I was looking for.

There's a market for air-cooled VW big-valve heads for racing. I think someone should market a replacement head with electric desmodromic valves and a small turbo right in the head. It could all fit where the pushrod tubes are now and bring that boxer 4 right up to date.

*OTOH a GIS on "coanda nozzle" gets results, so I'm off to learn.

Last edited by freebeard; 09-21-2012 at 09:35 PM.. Reason: addendum
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 04:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
try this link

http://cafefoundation.org/v2/pdf_caf...0PART%20IV.pdf
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2012, 07:58 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,710
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,927 Times in 7,370 Posts
403 Forbidden. It OK, really. The part about exhaust valve timing is enough for me.

OTOH, the phrase 'coanda nozzle' is magical. I've been looking through Google images. I found a post by basjoos on some gas saver forum in 2006 that pointed to a .pdf titled

SAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES***2001-01-2072
Advanced Aerodynamic Devices to Improve the Performance, Economics, Handling and Safety of Heavy Vehicles

which is awesome. Dynamic aero control with valved exit slots. Instead of a boat-tail, you can push the rear of the vehicle around with pumped air, and get drag reduction or air braking.

And this patent drawing suggests the exhaust tip might be better serrated than bellmouthed:
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2012, 08:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
okay. the pdf is the first one on this page

CAFE Foundation

Note: towards the bottom they even have having an experiment that shows a good wax job lowers drag.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ConnClark For This Useful Post:
mwebb (09-28-2012)
Old 09-23-2012, 10:17 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,710
Thanks: 8,150
Thanked 8,927 Times in 7,370 Posts
Now that one worked. Thank you for your persistence. When I got to the CAFE Foundation webpage I remembered it and the first link was already visited, so I must have tried and got the error previously. In any case I've got it now.

So they found muffling but no power increase. But they did measure 1--12 pounds of jet thrust on their test engine.

I'm still digesting what I've learned with the 'coanda nozzle' search. The Advanced Aerodynamic Devices article is at:

Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information - Sponsored by OSTI

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com