Quote:
Originally Posted by crmears
My situation is not one typically discussed here but the phyics of fuel economy are the same. My 2008 Class A diesel motorhome gets 8 mpg at 65 mph. I have a goal of getting a solid 11 mpg. It is 26,000 lbs, 8 by 13 feet for a frontal area of 104 sq. ft. It is shaped like a brick (front and rear) with rounded corners. It has 2 large ac units on top and a couple of vents stickins up also. The engine is a Cummins 360 hp, 8.3 liters, variable blade twin turbo, computer controled fuel injection and computer controled transmission.
My assumption is 70% of energy is used to overcome aerodynamic drag so that should be my focus. I own a body shop have the means to create a front end that looks like a Japanese bullet train with a remote controlled liftable air dam 3 inches from the pavement. I could also modify the rear to look like the rear of the bullet train.
Would this be enough to gain the desired 3 mpg? Or could it even give me more gain? Any other ideas.
Thanks,
Randy
|
Randy,if you can't re-locate the rooftop (Coleman?) AC units,could you fabricate a fairing which would better blend them into the roof? If you can get to an image of the 1987 OLDSMOBILE AEROTECH land speed record car you could look at how they ducted their heat-exchangers.NACA submerged inlets are supposed to offer the lowest drag for any inlet.
With respect to the nose,to really alter it would require a windshield which doesn't yet exist.Experts report time and time again,that if you have attached flow at the front ( and I presume you do ),then go after the back as has been already mentioned.
A radical approach would be a dedicated tadpole trailer which takes the form of an ideal boat-tail which moves your RVs separation point all the way back to zero,completely eliminating the diesel-eating turbulent wake.
Since you mentioned the Shinkansen already,you are probably aware that the nose of the train is ALSO the tail.The railway recently experimented with a 53-foot long nose/tail extension for drag reduction.These trains go through tunnels at speed,so they have some peculiar pressure spike phenomena they must address as the flying 'piston' attacks the' cylinder' bore.Something we need not be concerned with.But as a tail,I would be surprised that the train had any wake at all.
I suspect your drag coefficient may already be down around Cd 0.26 if you can get that s--- off the roof or clean it up.
The tail could cut that number in half again.Since it carries no load,the trailer would only have to be,in the words of Clarence Kelly Johnson,'strong enough.'
Any way you attack it,going after the 104 sq ft wake will show dividends at the pump.
Please take a look at the Aerodynamic Streamlining Template for design help.
Also threads 'Full-Boat-tail-trailer with Gap-Fillers for T-100 Pickup',and' 2011 Prius boat-tail trailer' here at the Aero Forum.